David Dueber

693 total citations
24 papers, 455 citations indexed

About

David Dueber is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Education and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, David Dueber has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 455 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in Education and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in David Dueber's work include Education and Technology Integration (4 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (4 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers). David Dueber is often cited by papers focused on Education and Technology Integration (4 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (4 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers). David Dueber collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. David Dueber's co-authors include Michael D. Toland, Cindy Jong, Molly H. Fisher, Edna O. Schack, Jonathan Thomas, Abigail M. A. Love, Lexine Stapinski, Amy L. Burton, Ronald M. Rapee and Maree J. Abbott and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Methods, Teaching and Teacher Education and Educational and Psychological Measurement.

In The Last Decade

David Dueber

22 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Dueber United States 11 197 142 119 84 55 24 455
Cristina Anguiano‐Carrasco Spain 11 210 1.1× 180 1.3× 84 0.7× 117 1.4× 95 1.7× 26 502
Dale S. Kim United States 7 205 1.0× 109 0.8× 123 1.0× 34 0.4× 95 1.7× 10 460
Nelson Hauck Filho Brazil 10 262 1.3× 135 1.0× 77 0.6× 35 0.4× 87 1.6× 76 461
Cristina Torrelles Nadal Spain 10 172 0.9× 249 1.8× 63 0.5× 92 1.1× 39 0.7× 23 414
Andrew T. Ainsworth United States 7 148 0.8× 63 0.4× 46 0.4× 78 0.9× 93 1.7× 14 431
Vasiliki Yotsidi Greece 13 286 1.5× 224 1.6× 84 0.7× 39 0.5× 25 0.5× 44 504
Simon Grégoire Canada 14 331 1.7× 165 1.2× 113 0.9× 26 0.3× 40 0.7× 29 518
Enrico Perinelli Italy 11 120 0.6× 171 1.2× 68 0.6× 44 0.5× 86 1.6× 28 415
Jie Luo China 13 313 1.6× 151 1.1× 76 0.6× 71 0.8× 145 2.6× 40 507

Countries citing papers authored by David Dueber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Dueber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Dueber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Dueber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Dueber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Dueber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Dueber. The network helps show where David Dueber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Dueber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Dueber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Dueber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Dueber. David Dueber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Love, Abigail M. A., David Dueber, Ru Ying Cai, et al.. (2025). Measuring Loneliness in Autistic Adults: A Collaborative Approach to Refining the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Autism in Adulthood. 2 indexed citations
2.
Oeffinger, Donna, Henry J. Iwinski, Vishwas Talwalkar, et al.. (2025). Examining the impact of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on psychosocial well-being and physical function: revealing insights from patient-reported outcomes. Spine Deformity. 13(6). 1851–1859.
3.
Ruble, Lisa A., et al.. (2024). A Comparison of Measurement of Stability and Predictors of Special Education Burnout and Work Engagement. Remedial and Special Education. 46(6). 442–455. 2 indexed citations
4.
Oeffinger, Donna, Henry J. Iwinski, Vishwas Talwalkar, & David Dueber. (2024). Psychometric analysis and the implications for the use of the scoliosis research society questionnaire (SRS-22r English) for individuals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ). 19. 100545–100545. 1 indexed citations
5.
Ruble, Lisa A., John H. McGrew, David Dueber, & Michelle P. Salyers. (2024). BREATHE-EASE Goals for Reducing Special Education Teacher Burnout. Teacher Education and Special Education The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children. 48(1). 5–25. 1 indexed citations
6.
McGrew, John H., et al.. (2023). Special educators’ mental health and burnout: A comparison of general and teacher specific risk factors. Teaching and Teacher Education. 132. 104209–104209. 14 indexed citations
8.
Dueber, David & Michael D. Toland. (2021). A bifactor approach to subscore assessment.. Psychological Methods. 28(1). 222–241. 33 indexed citations
9.
Jong, Cindy, Edna O. Schack, Molly H. Fisher, Jonathan Thomas, & David Dueber. (2021). What role does professional noticing play? Examining connections with affect and mathematical knowledge for teaching among preservice teachers. ZDM. 53(1). 151–164. 18 indexed citations
10.
Dueber, David, et al.. (2021). To Reverse Item Orientation or Not to Reverse Item Orientation, That Is the Question. Assessment. 29(7). 1422–1440. 18 indexed citations
11.
Roche, Michael J., et al.. (2021). Examining the Structure and Validity of Self-Report Measures of DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders Criterion A. Journal of Personality Disorders. 36(2). 157–182. 20 indexed citations
12.
Toland, Michael D., Paul Bowen, & David Dueber. (2020). Multidimensional Item Response Theory Analysis of Work-Related, After-Hours Contact, and Psychosocial Measurement Scales for Construction Professionals. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 146(7). 7 indexed citations
14.
Thomas, Jonathan & David Dueber. (2020). Thinking with Our Hands. Mathematics Teacher Learning and Teaching PK-12. 113(1). 69–73.
15.
Goldsmith, Judy, et al.. (2020). Assessing Ethical Thinking about AI. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 34(9). 13525–13528. 6 indexed citations
16.
Thomas, Jonathan, David Dueber, Molly H. Fisher, Cindy Jong, & Edna O. Schack. (2019). Professional Noticing into Practice: An Examination of Inservice Teachers’ Conceptions and Enactment. Investigations in Mathematics Learning. 12(2). 110–123. 1 indexed citations
17.
Rosenkrantz, Dani E., Sharon S. Rostosky, Michael D. Toland, & David Dueber. (2019). Cognitive-affective and religious values associated with parental acceptance of an LGBT child.. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. 7(1). 55–65. 15 indexed citations
18.
Fisher, Molly H., Jonathan Thomas, Cindy Jong, Edna O. Schack, & David Dueber. (2019). Comparing preservice teachers’ professional noticing skills in elementary mathematics classrooms. School Science and Mathematics. 119(3). 142–149. 13 indexed citations
19.
Dueber, David, et al.. (2018). Comparison of Single-Response Format and Forced-Choice Format Instruments Using Thurstonian Item Response Theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 79(1). 108–128. 25 indexed citations
20.
Dueber, David. (2017). Bifactor Indices Calculator. UKnowledge (University of Kentucky). 216 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026