David Constantine

19 papers receiving 82 citations

Peers

David Constantine
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Space and Planetary Science 7
  • Literature and Literary Theory 25
  • Anthropology 18
  • Mathematical Physics 15
  • Occupational Therapy 6
Replace Jules Michelet with:
Jules Michelet United States
John P. Meier United States
Eberhard Knobloch Germany
Giordano Bruno Italy
Gedaliahu G. Stroumsa Israel
Steven C. Tracy United States
Bernhard Bischoff Germany
Niccolò Guicciardini Italy
Bruno Schulz Germany
Umberto Bottazzini Italy
David Constantine relative to Jules Michelet United States Jules Michelet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Jules Michelet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Constantine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Constantine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Constantine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Constantine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Constantine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Constantine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Constantine. The network helps show where David Constantine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Constantine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Constantine Line = papers co-authored together David Constantine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198528
2 200220
3 202117
4 202010
5 200410
6 19886
7
Fields of fire : a life of Sir William Hamilton
20015
8 20204
9 20162
10 20182
11
Quantitative Shrinking Target Properties for rotations, interval exchanges and billiards in rational polygons
20122
12 19942
13 20111
14 19791
15 19871
16 19971
17 19931
18 19841
19 19961
20 19781

About David Constantine

David Constantine is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory and Anthropology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 120 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (6 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (4 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (4 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (3 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (3 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (3 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (7 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (25 citations), Anthropology (18 citations), Mathematical Physics (15 citations) and Occupational Therapy (6 citations). David Constantine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Richard Jenkyns, Jean‐François Lafont, Daniel J. Thompson, Nathan Bray, Paula W. Rushton, Rosemary Joan Gowran, Mary Goldberg, Jonathan Pearlman, Dagmar C. G. Lorenz and Anne Fuchs. Their work appears in journals such as Oxford German Studies, The Modern Language Review, The American Historical Review, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Translation and Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact