David Carmel
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Information Systems top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Nilli LavieGina M. GrimshawGeraint ReesAdam DarlowElad Yom‐TovHaggai RoitmanShai FineNaama Zwerdling
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (25 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (20 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Carmel
59 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 335
- Artificial Intelligence 311
- Information Systems 297
- Social Psychology 268
Countries citing papers authored by David Carmel
This map shows the geographic impact of David Carmel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Carmel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Carmel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Carmel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Carmel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Carmel. The network helps show where David Carmel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Carmel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Carmel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Carmel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Carmel. David Carmel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | Overview of the TREC 2015 LiveQA Track. | 22 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | The Connectivity Sonar: Detecting Site Functionality by Structural Patterns | 18 |
| 17 | Juru at TREC 2004: Experiments with Prediction of Query Difficulty. | 10 |
| 18 | 77 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 295 |
About David Carmel
David Carmel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (25 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (20 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (335 citations) and Information Systems (297 citations). David Carmel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nilli Lavie, Gina M. Grimshaw, Geraint Rees, Adam Darlow, Elad Yom‐Tov, Haggai Roitman, Shai Fine, Naama Zwerdling, Einat Amitay and Aya Soffer. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Current Biology and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.