David C. Cicero

655 citations
22 papers · 365 indexed · h-index 11
  • Accounting top 5%
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 21
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 18
    • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance 5
  • Finance top 5%
    • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 11
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 4
    • Financial Reporting and Valuation Research 1
    • Housing Market and Economics 2
    • Firm Innovation and Growth 2

David C. Cicero

22 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

David C. Cicero
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Accounting 316
  • Finance 206
  • Strategy and Management 59
  • Economics and Econometrics 76
  • Safety Research 17
Replace Pei-Gi Shu with:
Pei-Gi Shu Taiwan
Rik Sen Australia
Péter Cziráki Canada
Artur Hugon United States
Michael A. Mazzeo United States
Yuk Ying Chang New Zealand
Yanfeng Xue United States
Sirui Yin United States
Chih-Yung Lin Taiwan
Sugata Ray United States
David C. Cicero relative to Pei-Gi Shu Taiwan Pei-Gi Shu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Pei-Gi Shu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Cicero

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Cicero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Cicero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Cicero more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Cicero

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Cicero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Cicero. The network helps show where David C. Cicero may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside David C. Cicero, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David C. Cicero Line = papers co-authored together David C. Cicero links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20234
2 20228
3 20205
4 202013
5 20205
6 20176
7 20171
8 20162
9 201633
10 20151
11 201499
12 201312
13 20138
14 201234
15 201215
16 20125
17 20112
18 201012
19 200916
20 200711

About David C. Cicero

David C. Cicero is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (21 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (18 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (11 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (5 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (4 papers), Housing Market and Economics (2 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (2 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (316 citations), Finance (206 citations) and Strategy and Management (59 citations). David C. Cicero has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include M. Babajide Wintoki, Fred Bereskin, Tina Yang, Andy Puckett, Shawn Mobbs, Johan Sulaeman, Binay Adhikari, Lauren C. Reid, Weili Ge and Albert Y. Wang. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics and Management Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026