Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by David B. Yoffie
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David B. Yoffie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David B. Yoffie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David B. Yoffie more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David B. Yoffie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David B. Yoffie. The network helps show where David B. Yoffie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David B. Yoffie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David B. Yoffie.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David B. Yoffie based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David B. Yoffie. David B. Yoffie is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Yoffie, David B., Annabelle Gawer, & Michael A. Cusumano. (2019). A study of more than 250 platforms a reveal why most fail. Harvard business review.19 indexed citations
Yoffie, David B., et al.. (2012). Apple Inc. in 2012.4 indexed citations
5.
Hagiu, Andrei & David B. Yoffie. (2009). What's Your Google Strategy?. Harvard business review. 87(4). 74–81.45 indexed citations
6.
Casadesus‐Masanell, Ramon & David B. Yoffie. (2007). Wintel: Cooperation and Conflict.7 indexed citations
7.
Yoffie, David B., et al.. (2006). Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010.6 indexed citations
8.
Yoffie, David B., et al.. (2006). With friends like these: the art of managing complementors.. PubMed. 84(9). 88–98, 157.85 indexed citations
9.
Yoffie, David B., et al.. (2005). Intel Corporation 2005. 27(1). 33–40.7 indexed citations
10.
Yoffie, David B., et al.. (2001). Mastering Strategic Movement at Palm. MIT Sloan management review. 43(1). 55–63.8 indexed citations
11.
Yoffie, David B., et al.. (2001). Microsoft in 2002.1 indexed citations
12.
Spar, Debora L. & David B. Yoffie. (1999). Multinational Enterprises and the Prospects for Justice. Journal of international affairs. 52(2). 557.16 indexed citations
13.
Yoffie, David B. & Sharon Foley. (1994). Cola Wars Continue: Coke vs. Pepsi in the 1990s.5 indexed citations
Tyson, Laura D’Andrea & David B. Yoffie. (1991). Semiconductors: From Manipulated to Managed Trade. eScholarship (California Digital Library).3 indexed citations
16.
Yoffie, David B., et al.. (1991). Sobre la historia de la enseñanza de la estadística en las universidades argentinas. Estadística española. 533–558.
17.
Yoffie, David B., et al.. (1990). The transformation of IBM.2 indexed citations
18.
Yoffie, David B., et al.. (1989). New Theories of International Trade. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 98(5). 1064–72.4 indexed citations
19.
Yoffie, David B.. (1981). The Advantages of adversity : weak states and the political economy of trade. University Microfilms International eBooks.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.