Darryl D. Dixon
- Organic Chemistry top 1%
- Pharmaceutical Science top 0.2%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Phil S. BaranMichael R. CollinsRodrigo A. RodriguezRyan D. BaxterYuta FujiwaraJonathan W. LocknerFionn O’HaraYoshihiro Ishihara
- Topics
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers)Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (4 papers)Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceCanada
In The Last Decade
Darryl D. Dixon
22 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Organic Chemistry 1.9k
- Pharmaceutical Science 1000
- Inorganic Chemistry 529
- Molecular Biology 294
- Pharmacology 108
Countries citing papers authored by Darryl D. Dixon
This map shows the geographic impact of Darryl D. Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Darryl D. Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Darryl D. Dixon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Darryl D. Dixon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Darryl D. Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Darryl D. Dixon. The network helps show where Darryl D. Dixon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Darryl D. Dixon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Darryl D. Dixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Darryl D. Dixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Darryl D. Dixon. Darryl D. Dixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 156 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 257 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 157 | |
| 11 | 50 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | Practical and innate carbon–hydrogen functionalization of heterocyclesbreakdown → | 813 |
| 14 | 125 | |
| 15 | A New Reagent for Direct Difluoromethylationbreakdown → | 544 |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Darryl D. Dixon
Darryl D. Dixon is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science and Toxicology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (4 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (1000 citations), Organic Chemistry (1.9k citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (529 citations). Darryl D. Dixon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Phil S. Baran, Michael R. Collins, Rodrigo A. Rodriguez, Ryan D. Baxter, Yuta Fujiwara, Jonathan W. Lockner, Fionn O’Hara, Yoshihiro Ishihara, Bart Herlé and Donna G. Blackmond. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.