Dario Galati
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Tommaso CostaIgor SotgiuKlaus R. SchererPio E. Ricci-BittiCarla TintiSusanna SchmidtRenato MiceliMarco Tettamanti
- Topics
- Emotions and Moral Behavior (6 papers)Face Recognition and Perception (5 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
Dario Galati
25 papers receiving 529 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Cognitive Neuroscience 288
- Social Psychology 247
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 203
- Clinical Psychology 102
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 55
Countries citing papers authored by Dario Galati
This map shows the geographic impact of Dario Galati's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dario Galati with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dario Galati more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dario Galati
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dario Galati. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dario Galati. The network helps show where Dario Galati may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dario Galati
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dario Galati. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dario Galati based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dario Galati. Dario Galati is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 66 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 73 | |
| 12 | The Effect of Singing on Subjective Emotional State and Psychophysiological Response in Singers | 1 |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | What makes us happy? A study on the subjective representation of happiness components. | 4 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Dario Galati
Dario Galati is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 569 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (6 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (5 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (203 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (288 citations) and Social Psychology (247 citations). Dario Galati has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Cuba and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Tommaso Costa, Igor Sotgiu, Klaus R. Scherer, Pio E. Ricci-Bitti, Carla Tinti, Susanna Schmidt, Renato Miceli, Marco Tettamanti, Daniela Perani and Manuela Lavelli. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, NeuroImage and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.