Danielle Gottlieb
- Surgery top 10%
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Transplantation top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- John E. MayerMichael S. SacksElena AïkawaJulie D. SabaRyan A. McTaggartStephen J. TomlanovichWarren HeidemanPeter Bacchetti
- Topics
- Congenital Heart Disease Studies (5 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers)Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesZimbabweNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Danielle Gottlieb
18 papers receiving 531 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Surgery 308
- Biomaterials 190
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 168
- Transplantation 108
- Molecular Biology 96
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Gottlieb
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Gottlieb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Gottlieb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Gottlieb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Gottlieb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Gottlieb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Gottlieb. The network helps show where Danielle Gottlieb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danielle Gottlieb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danielle Gottlieb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danielle Gottlieb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danielle Gottlieb. Danielle Gottlieb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 33 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | Pulmonary artery conduit in vivo dimensional requirements in a growing ovine model: comparisons with the ascending aorta. | 7 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 111 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 139 | |
| 16 | Like a terrorist. | 4 |
| 17 | Infant Feeding: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Among Women in Zimbabwe | 2 |
| 18 | 61 |
About Danielle Gottlieb
Danielle Gottlieb is a scholar working on Transplantation, Biomaterials and Surgery, having authored 18 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (5 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (108 citations), Biomaterials (190 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (168 citations). Danielle Gottlieb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Zimbabwe and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include John E. Mayer, Michael S. Sacks, Elena Aïkawa, Julie D. Saba, Ryan A. McTaggart, Stephen J. Tomlanovich, Warren Heideman, Peter Bacchetti, John P. Roberts and Sandy Feng. Their work appears in journals such as Biomaterials, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.