George Stetten
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Surgery
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Roberta L. KlatzkyVikram S. ChibBing WuJoseph KissloRobert TamburoTakahiro OtaJohn GaleottiGabrielle A. Nevitt
- Topics
- Augmented Reality Applications (17 papers)Surgical Simulation and Training (16 papers)Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (14 papers)
- Cited by
- Human-Computer InteractionComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandIsrael
In The Last Decade
George Stetten
75 papers receiving 856 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 245
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 212
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 184
- Surgery 183
- Cognitive Neuroscience 160
Countries citing papers authored by George Stetten
This map shows the geographic impact of George Stetten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Stetten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Stetten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Stetten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Stetten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Stetten. The network helps show where George Stetten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Stetten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Stetten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Stetten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Stetten. George Stetten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 61 | |
| 18 | 71 | |
| 19 | Wireless Infrared Networking in the Duke Paperless Classroom. | 8 |
| 20 | 4 |
About George Stetten
George Stetten is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 78 papers that have together received 896 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Augmented Reality Applications (17 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (16 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (94 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (245 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (212 citations). George Stetten has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Roberta L. Klatzky, Vikram S. Chib, Bing Wu, Joseph Kisslo, Robert Tamburo, Takahiro Ota, John Galeotti, Bing Wu, Gabrielle A. Nevitt and N. Dean Pentcheff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Radiology and Optics Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.