Danielle Booth

1.3k citations
14 papers · 829 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Booth

14 papers receiving 776 citations

Peers

Danielle Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Information Systems 512
  • Computer Science Applications 74
  • Information Systems and Management 82
  • Artificial Intelligence 288
  • Signal Processing 79
Replace Don Turnbull with:
Don Turnbull United States
Judy Bateman United States
Toine Bogers Denmark
Daniel E. Rose United States
Anastasios Tombros United Kingdom
Ayşe Göker United Kingdom
Shuguang Han United States
Vibha Singhal Sinha India
Maria Soledad Pera United States
Inbal Ronen Israel
Danielle Booth relative to Don Turnbull United States Don Turnbull's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Don Turnbull · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Booth. The network helps show where Danielle Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Booth Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2007308
2
Determining the informational, navigational and transactional intent of web queries
2008133
3 2007120
4 2009114
5 200955
6 201032
7 200924
8 201618
9 201111
10 20095
11 20073
12 20093
13 20072
14 20111

About Danielle Booth

Danielle Booth is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Communication, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 829 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (10 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (6 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers), Expert finding and Q&A systems (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers) and Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (512 citations), Computer Science Applications (74 citations), Information Systems and Management (82 citations), Artificial Intelligence (288 citations) and Signal Processing (79 citations). Danielle Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bernard J. Jansen, Amanda Spink, Brian Smith, Z. Ihara, Ying Zhang and Mimi Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Information Processing & Management, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, European Urology Focus, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology and IGI Global eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026