Daniela Sousa Coelho
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Pharmacology
- Food Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Marcelo MaraschinBeatriz VeleirinhoRosa Maria Ribeiro‐do‐ValleThaís AlbertiJosé A. Lopes‐da‐SilvaPaulo Fernando DiasAna Paula Lorenzen VoytenaLetícia Mazzarino
- Topics
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (5 papers)Coffee research and impacts (4 papers)Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Materials Science
- Partner nations
- BrazilPortugalUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniela Sousa Coelho
20 papers receiving 433 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Biomaterials 190
- Rehabilitation 95
- Biomedical Engineering 87
- Pharmacology 79
- Food Science 72
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Sousa Coelho
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Sousa Coelho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Sousa Coelho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Sousa Coelho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Sousa Coelho
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Sousa Coelho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Sousa Coelho. The network helps show where Daniela Sousa Coelho may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela Sousa Coelho
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela Sousa Coelho. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela Sousa Coelho based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela Sousa Coelho. Daniela Sousa Coelho is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 55 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 48 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 58 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 70 | |
| 18 | 50 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 76 |
About Daniela Sousa Coelho
Daniela Sousa Coelho is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Pharmacology and Biomaterials, having authored 20 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (5 papers), Coffee research and impacts (4 papers) and Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (190 citations), Rehabilitation (95 citations) and Biochemistry (32 citations). Daniela Sousa Coelho has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marcelo Maraschin, Beatriz Veleirinho, Rosa Maria Ribeiro‐do‐Valle, Thaís Alberti, José A. Lopes‐da‐Silva, Paulo Fernando Dias, Ana Paula Lorenzen Voytena, Letícia Mazzarino, Virgílio Gavicho Uarrota and Aline Garcia Pereira. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Materials Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.