Daniela Digles

2.7k citations
23 papers · 1.8k · 3 hit papers · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Digles

23 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Daniela Digles's Hit Papers

WikiPathways 2024: next generation pathway database 2023 · 229 citations
2290+3+6Years since publication200400600

Peers

Daniela Digles
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 151
  • Molecular Biology 490
  • Aging 6
  • Cancer Research 53
  • Biochemistry 16
Replace Sonam Dolma with:
Sonam Dolma United States
Aurélien J. F. Dugourd Germany
Özlem Altay Sweden
Xiangyü Li China
Denise Slenter Netherlands
Anders Riutta United States
Ryan A. Miller Netherlands
D. Vidović United States
Ghita Ghislat United Kingdom
Emily Clough United States
Daniela Digles relative to Sonam Dolma United States Sonam Dolma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Sonam Dolma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Digles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Digles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Digles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Digles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Digles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Digles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Digles. The network helps show where Daniela Digles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Digles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Digles Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Digles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
WikiPathways: a multifaceted pathway database bridging metabolomics to other omics research
Hit paper breakdown →
2017670
2
WikiPathways: connecting communities
Hit paper breakdown →
2020587
3
WikiPathways 2024: next generation pathway database
Hit paper breakdown →
2023229
4 202082
5 202153
6 201430
7 201126
8 201625
9 201420
10 201420
11 201415
12 201615
13 202511
14 202110
15 20188
16 20246
17 20144
18 20194
19 20243
20 20162

About Daniela Digles

Daniela Digles is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence and Genetics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (9 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (5 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (4 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (2 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (151 citations), Molecular Biology (490 citations), Aging (6 citations), Cancer Research (53 citations) and Biochemistry (16 citations). Daniela Digles has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chris T. Evelo, Andra Waagmeester, Martina Kutmon, Egon Willighagen, Ammar Ammar, Denise Slenter, Friederike Ehrhart, Marvin Martens, Susan L. Coort and Lauren J. Dupuis. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Drug Discovery Today Technologies, Frontiers in Pharmacology, MedChemComm and F1000Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact