Daniel W. M. Maitland

18 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Daniel W. M. Maitland
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Clinical Psychology 186
  • Social Psychology 87
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 68
  • Sociology and Political Science 56
  • General Health Professions 31
Replace Kelley A. Tompkins with:
Kelley A. Tompkins United States
Jennifer R. Henretty United States
Sherry Farrow United States
John M. Chamberlain United States
Janet L. Muse‐Burke United States
Sergi Corbella Spain
Joanna M. Drinane United States
Gülşah Kemer United States
Lynda W. Warren United States
Susan I. Hardin United States
Daniel W. M. Maitland relative to Kelley A. Tompkins United States Kelley A. Tompkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Kelley A. Tompkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. M. Maitland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. M. Maitland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. M. Maitland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. M. Maitland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. M. Maitland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. M. Maitland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. M. Maitland. The network helps show where Daniel W. M. Maitland may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel W. M. Maitland

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel W. M. Maitland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel W. M. Maitland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel W. M. Maitland. Daniel W. M. Maitland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 2
5 8
6 7
7 1
8 58
9 11
10 12
11 18
12 4
13 33
14 27
15 2
16 17
17 11
18
Functional analytic psychotherapy compared to watchful waiting for enhancing social connectedness: A randomized clinical trial with a diagnosed sample
1
19
The Distinctiveness, Intimacy, and Efficacy of FAP Compared to Non-Directive Support: An Alternating Treatments Design
2
20 26

About Daniel W. M. Maitland

Daniel W. M. Maitland is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (11 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (186 citations), General Psychology (8 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (68 citations). Daniel W. M. Maitland has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Bolivia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan W. Kanter, Scott T. Gaynor, Katherine E. Manbeck, Adam M. Kuczynski, Daniel C. Rosen, Monnica T. Williams, Elizabeth C. Neilson, Robert J. Kohlenberg, Chad T. Wetterneck and Rajinder Sonia Singh. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships and BMC Medical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026