Daniel W. Graham
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
Papers in
- Philosophy 32
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 31
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 5
- Archeology 12
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 10
- Co-authors
- Patricia CurdVictor CastonGregory VlastosJulia AnnasRichard McKirahanCharles W. TaylorA. A. LongJ. H. Lesher
- Journals
- Ancient Philosophy (10 papers)Apeiron (6 papers)The Classical Quarterly (3 papers)The American Journal of Philology (2 papers)Phoenix (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Daniel W. Graham
47 papers receiving 252 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Philosophy 245
- Anthropology 141
- Archeology 137
- History and Philosophy of Science 47
- General Psychology 5
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Graham
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Graham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Graham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Graham. The network helps show where Daniel W. Graham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Graham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 3 | Socrates as a Deontologist | 2017 | 1 |
| 4 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 63 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 14 | Socrates, Plato, and their tradition | 1995 | 3 |
| 15 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0 | |
| 17 | The Etymology of Entelecheia | 1989 | 3 |
| 18 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 1 |
About Daniel W. Graham
Daniel W. Graham is a scholar working on Philosophy, Archeology, Anthropology, History and Philosophy of Science and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (31 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (10 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (6 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (5 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (2 papers) and Mormonism, Religion, and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (245 citations), Anthropology (141 citations), Archeology (137 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (47 citations) and General Psychology (5 citations). Daniel W. Graham has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Curd, Victor Caston, Gregory Vlastos, Julia Annas, Richard McKirahan, Charles W. Taylor, A. A. Long, J. H. Lesher, Paul Woodruff and A. A. Long. Their work appears in journals such as Ancient Philosophy, Apeiron, The Classical Quarterly, The American Journal of Philology and Phoenix.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.