Daniel W. Denman

20 papers receiving 844 citations

Peers

Daniel W. Denman
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Biochemistry 154
  • Library and Information Sciences 30
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 249
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 213
  • Clinical Psychology 177
Replace Matthew R. Lee with:
Matthew R. Lee United States
Mary B. Williams United States
S. G. Korenman United States
Belinda K. Cornes Australia
Michael D. Powers United States
Lon J. Van Winkle United States
Jennifer A O'Brien United States
Helen Davis United States
Silvia Leonor Olivera United States
J. Stern United Kingdom
Daniel W. Denman relative to Matthew R. Lee United States Matthew R. Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Matthew R. Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Denman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Denman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Denman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Denman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Denman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Denman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Denman. The network helps show where Daniel W. Denman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Denman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel W. Denman Line = papers co-authored together Daniel W. Denman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1987218
2 1993168
3 1996124
4 199078
5 199254
6 199651
7 198340
8 200630
9 199730
10 199729
11 199228
12 198319
13 198616
14 198616
15 198314
16 200610
17 19859
18 19935
19 20043
20
The combined effects of asbestos ingestion and localized X-irradiation of the colon in rats.
19843

About Daniel W. Denman

Daniel W. Denman is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Reproductive Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 945 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (3 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (2 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (154 citations), Library and Information Sciences (30 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (249 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (213 citations) and Clinical Psychology (177 citations). Daniel W. Denman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Clara E. Hill, B. J. Thompson, Peter Arensburger, James J. Schlesselman, Howard J. Hoffman, Margaret A. Palmer, Eileen G. Abels, Joseph D. Schulman, Adam J. Jonas and George F. Reed. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marketing, Journal of Counseling Psychology, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Oecologia and Journal of Applied Gerontology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact