Daniel Vilceanu

9 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Daniel Vilceanu
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Sensory Systems 156
  • Physiology 252
  • Genetics 90
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 132
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 40
Replace Emerson Marcelo Motta with:
Emerson Marcelo Motta Brazil
Kelly L. Knopp United States
Jingjiang Nie United States
Sara González‐Rodríguez Spain
Moh Panesar United Kingdom
Maria Fernanda Pessano Fialho Brazil
Kim Sun Ho United States
Jill‐Desiree Brederson United States
Ingrid Liebmann Austria
Aleta L. Svitak United States
Daniel Vilceanu relative to Emerson Marcelo Motta Brazil Emerson Marcelo Motta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Emerson Marcelo Motta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Vilceanu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Vilceanu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Vilceanu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Vilceanu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Vilceanu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Vilceanu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Vilceanu. The network helps show where Daniel Vilceanu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Vilceanu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Vilceanu Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Vilceanu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2011123
2 2010110
3 201272
4 201361
5 200948
6 201344
7 201524
8 20217
9
Analysis of Ocular Circadian Rhythms Using Per2::Luc Knock–In Mice
20061

About Daniel Vilceanu

Daniel Vilceanu is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Rehabilitation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (1 paper) and Exercise and Physiological Responses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (156 citations), Physiology (252 citations), Genetics (90 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (132 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (40 citations). Daniel Vilceanu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Croatia. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl L. Stucky, Quinn H. Hogan, Nancy J. Wandersee, Marie E. Barabas, Cheryl A. Hillery, Patrick C. Kerstein, Amanda M. Brandow, Prisca Honoré, Gregory Fischer and Bin Pan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Pain, Journal of Neuroscience, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Gene Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact