Daniël Van Olmen

734 citations
31 papers · 129 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Daniël Van Olmen

26 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers

Daniël Van Olmen
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • Language and Linguistics 114
  • Linguistics and Language 35
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
  • Communication 13
  • Cultural Studies 12
Replace Eithne B. Carlin with:
Eithne B. Carlin Netherlands
Steve Nicolle United Kingdom
Tatiana Nikitina France
Lívia Kőrtvélyessy Slovakia
Jacqueline Visconti Italy
Andrea Sansò Italy
Renata Enghels Belgium
Lobke Ghesquière Belgium
Haiping Long China
Ellen Contini–Morava United States
Daniël Van Olmen relative to Eithne B. Carlin Netherlands Eithne B. Carlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Eithne B. Carlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniël Van Olmen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniël Van Olmen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniël Van Olmen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniël Van Olmen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniël Van Olmen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniël Van Olmen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniël Van Olmen. The network helps show where Daniël Van Olmen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Daniël Van Olmen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniël Van Olmen Line = papers co-authored together Daniël Van Olmen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201319
2 201017
3 202213
4 20109
5 20096
6 20106
7 20236
8 20195
9 20175
10 20155
11 20135
12 20224
13 20143
14 20163
15 20213
16 20123
17 20182
18 20182
19
Imperatives and directive strategies from a functional-typological perspective:an introduction
20172
20 20132

About Daniël Van Olmen

Daniël Van Olmen is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 31 papers that have together received 129 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (14 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (13 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (9 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (6 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers) and Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (114 citations), Linguistics and Language (35 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations), Communication (13 citations) and Cultural Studies (12 citations). Daniël Van Olmen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Maud Devos, Vittorio Tantucci, Hubert Cuyckens, Johan van der Auwera, Jonathan Culpeper, Ben Verhoeven, Lobke Ghesquière, Dimitrinka Atanasova, Aina Casaponsa and Claire Nance. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Language, Journal of Pragmatics, Linguistic Typology, Functions of Language and Folia Linguistica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact