Countries where authors publish in Studies in Language
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Language. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Language with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Language more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Language. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Language.
About Studies in Language
The 983 papers published in Studies in Language in the last decades have received a total of 10.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Studies in Language usually cover Language and Linguistics (744 papers), Linguistics and Language (325 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (267 papers), Cultural Studies (52 papers) and Philosophy (64 papers) specifically the topics of Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (508 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (263 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (223 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (165 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (123 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (89 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (78 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Language are T. Givón, Thomas L. Willett, R. M. W. Dixon, Martín Haspelmath, Sandra A. Thompson, Matthew S. Dryer, Bernd Heine, Patricia Mayes, Tania Kuteva and Scott DeLancey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.