Daniel Turk

715 total citations
10 papers, 445 citations indexed

About

Daniel Turk is a scholar working on Information Systems, Management Information Systems and Software. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Turk has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 445 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Information Systems, 3 papers in Management Information Systems and 3 papers in Software. Recurrent topics in Daniel Turk's work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (6 papers), Software Engineering Research (4 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (3 papers). Daniel Turk is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (6 papers), Software Engineering Research (4 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (3 papers). Daniel Turk collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Daniel Turk's co-authors include Bernhard Rumpe⋆, Vijay K. Vaishnavi, Matteo Cella, Sagar Jilka, Gretchen Irwin, Daniel Robey, Richard J. Welke, V. Vaishnavi, Sudipto Ghosh and Robert France and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Turk

8 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Turk United States	5	259	103	73	68	67	10	445
Helen M. Edwards United Kingdom	13	220 0.8×	40 0.4×	49 0.7×	53 0.8×	80 1.2×	55	495
Chandra Maddila United States	8	201 0.8×	38 0.4×	41 0.6×	84 1.2×	15 0.2×	17	378
Luca Cernuzzi Paraguay	12	124 0.5×	35 0.3×	19 0.3×	132 1.9×	59 0.9×	71	465
Vladimir Kovalenko Netherlands	8	184 0.7×	65 0.6×	29 0.4×	27 0.4×	13 0.2×	20	325
Rana Alkadhi Germany	9	317 1.2×	17 0.2×	28 0.4×	119 1.8×	17 0.3×	10	446
Davoud Mougouei Australia	9	132 0.5×	32 0.3×	25 0.3×	61 0.9×	21 0.3×	24	245
Jacob L. Cybulski Australia	11	155 0.6×	32 0.3×	22 0.3×	88 1.3×	82 1.2×	50	327
Claudia Iacob United Kingdom	10	285 1.1×	32 0.3×	15 0.2×	86 1.3×	11 0.2×	25	437
Marta N. Gómez Spain	6	202 0.8×	22 0.2×	72 1.0×	12 0.2×	22 0.3×	11	287
Alex Buckley United Kingdom	11	102 0.4×	74 0.7×	34 0.5×	117 1.7×	4 0.1×	19	484

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Turk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Turk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Turk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Turk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Turk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Turk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Turk. The network helps show where Daniel Turk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Turk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Turk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Turk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Turk. Daniel Turk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Turk, Daniel, et al.. (2021). Shifting the Mobility Paradigm of Intermediate Cities in Tanzania. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks.

2.

Turk, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Measuring attitudes towards mental health using social media: investigating stigma and trivialisation. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 54(1). 51–58. 124 indexed citations

3.

Irwin, Gretchen & Daniel Turk. (2005). An Ontological Analysis of Use Case Modeling Grammar. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 6(1). 1–36. 29 indexed citations

4.

Turk, Daniel, et al.. (2005). Assumptions Underlying Agile Software-Development Processes. Journal of Database Management. 16(4). 62–87. 139 indexed citations

5.

France, Robert, Sudipto Ghosh, & Daniel Turk. (2003). Supporting Effective Software Modeling. 9(4). 11–29. 1 indexed citations

6.

Vaishnavi, Vijay K., et al.. (2003). Predicting maintenance performance using object-oriented design complexity metrics. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 4 indexed citations

7.

Vaishnavi, Vijay K., et al.. (2003). Predicting maintenance performance using object-oriented design complexity metrics. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 29(1). 77–87. 107 indexed citations

8.

Robey, Daniel, Richard J. Welke, & Daniel Turk. (2001). Traditional, iterative, and component-based development: A social analysis of software development paradigms. Information Technology and Management. 2(1). 53–70. 38 indexed citations

9.

Turk, Daniel & V. Vaishnavi. (1999). Problem and Solution Frameworks for Software Development Process Modeling. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2 indexed citations

10.

Turk, Daniel, et al.. (1998). Process Modelers Need Models Too: Using Scenarios in Software Development Process Modeling. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact