Daniel Toribio‐Flórez

10 papers receiving 79 citations

Peers

Daniel Toribio‐Flórez
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Communication 11
  • Information Systems and Management 9
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 8
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 21
  • Sociology and Political Science 49
Replace Brendan Spillane with:
Brendan Spillane Ireland
Monica Gamez-Djokic United States
Carina Prunkl United Kingdom
Tatiana Celadin Italy
Angélique M. Blackburn United States
Michael Geers Germany
Yara Kyrychenko United Kingdom
Matthias F. C. Hudecek Germany
Peter Keegan New Zealand
Stefan Selke Germany
Daniel Toribio‐Flórez relative to Brendan Spillane Ireland Brendan Spillane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Brendan Spillane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Toribio‐Flórez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Toribio‐Flórez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Toribio‐Flórez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Toribio‐Flórez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Toribio‐Flórez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Toribio‐Flórez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Toribio‐Flórez. The network helps show where Daniel Toribio‐Flórez may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Toribio‐Flórez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Toribio‐Flórez Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Toribio‐Flórez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 202123
2 202222
3 202312
4 20228
5 20244
6 20244
7 20243
8 20203
9 20233
10 20251
11 20250
12 20250
13 20240

About Daniel Toribio‐Flórez

Daniel Toribio‐Flórez is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication and Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 83 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (11 citations), Information Systems and Management (9 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (8 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (21 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (49 citations). Daniel Toribio‐Flórez has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Karen M. Douglas, Ricky Green, Robbie M. Sutton, H. Windel, Martijn Pallandt, Anna Baumert, Mikey Biddlestone, Sinan Alper, Valerio Capraro and Frenk van Harreveld. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, British Journal of Psychology, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact