Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage
2007438 citationsDaniel T. Lichter et al.profile →
Rural America in an Urban Society: Changing Spatial and Social Boundaries
2011331 citationsDaniel T. Lichter et al.profile →
Rural Depopulation: Growth and Decline Processes over the Past Century
2019258 citationsDaniel T. Lichter et al.Rural Sociologyprofile →
Cohabitation and Marriage: Complexity and Diversity in Union‐Formation Patterns
2020171 citationsSharon Sassler, Daniel T. Lichterprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Lichter
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Lichter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Lichter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Lichter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Lichter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Lichter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Lichter. The network helps show where Daniel T. Lichter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel T. Lichter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel T. Lichter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel T. Lichter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel T. Lichter. Daniel T. Lichter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lichter, Daniel T., et al.. (1989). The timing of family formation: rural-urban differentials in first intercourse, childbirth, and marriage. Rural Sociology. 54(1).42 indexed citations
13.
Lichter, Daniel T., et al.. (1987). How do demographic changes affect labor force participation of women. Monthly labor review. 110(11). 23.15 indexed citations
14.
Lichter, Daniel T., et al.. (1987). Nonmetropolitan Underemployment and Labor-Force Composition.. Rural Sociology. 52(3).50 indexed citations
15.
Lichter, Daniel T. & Tim B. Heaton. (1986). Black composition and change in the nonmetropolitan South.. Rural Sociology. 51(3).5 indexed citations
16.
Lichter, Daniel T., et al.. (1985). Components of Nonmetropolitan Population Changes: The Contribution of Rural Areas.. Rural Sociology. 50(1). 88–98.14 indexed citations
Lichter, Daniel T.. (1981). Household migration and the labor market experiences of married women. University Microfilms International eBooks.1 indexed citations
Lichter, Daniel T., et al.. (1979). Trends in the selectivity of migration between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas: 1955-1975. Rural Sociology. 44(4).18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.