Daniel Stone
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
-
- Media Influence and Politics 15
-
- Polish Historical and Cultural Studies 9
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 6
- Co-authors
- Joseph Price (2 shared papers)Marcel Garz (5 shared papers)Jeremy Arkes (3 shared papers)Piotr S. Wandycz (1 shared paper)Jimmy Chan (2 shared papers)Basit Zafar (1 shared paper)Ryan M. Rodenberg (1 shared paper)Gaurav Sood (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (4 papers)Slavic Review (4 papers)Journal of Sports Economics (3 papers)Canadian Slavonic Papers (3 papers)Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Daniel Stone
47 papers receiving 363 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- General Decision Sciences 29
- Communication 68
- Economics and Econometrics 198
- Gender Studies 59
- Safety Research 49
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Stone
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Stone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Stone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Stone. The network helps show where Daniel Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 5 |
About Daniel Stone
Daniel Stone is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Communication and Safety Research, having authored 59 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Politics (15 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (12 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (9 papers), Media Studies and Communication (7 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers) and Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (29 citations), Communication (68 citations), Economics and Econometrics (198 citations), Gender Studies (59 citations) and Safety Research (49 citations). Daniel Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Price, Marcel Garz, Jeremy Arkes, Piotr S. Wandycz, Jimmy Chan, Basit Zafar, Ryan M. Rodenberg, Gaurav Sood, Steven J. Miller and Matthew Gentzkow. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Slavic Review, Journal of Sports Economics, Canadian Slavonic Papers and Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.