Daniel Sligte

600 total citations
8 papers, 427 citations indexed

About

Daniel Sligte is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Sligte has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 427 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Daniel Sligte's work include Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). Daniel Sligte is often cited by papers focused on Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). Daniel Sligte collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Israel. Daniel Sligte's co-authors include Carsten K. W. De Dreu, Bernard A. Nijstad, Marieke Roskes, Matthijs Baas, Shaul Shalvi, Mauro Giacomantonio, Susanne Leder, Soo Hong Chew, Terry Y.Y. Tong and Simone Shamay‐Tsoory and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Sligte

8 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Sligte Netherlands 7 208 197 117 108 83 8 427
Markus Denzler Germany 12 293 1.4× 239 1.2× 236 2.0× 187 1.7× 116 1.4× 14 623
Andrew G. Christy United States 9 195 0.9× 65 0.3× 59 0.5× 140 1.3× 64 0.8× 14 402
Lile Jia Singapore 12 303 1.5× 221 1.1× 88 0.8× 188 1.7× 277 3.3× 28 617
Hugh E. McDonald United States 8 214 1.0× 231 1.2× 186 1.6× 118 1.1× 119 1.4× 9 516
Zhijin Zhou China 13 182 0.9× 247 1.3× 141 1.2× 44 0.4× 17 0.2× 50 490
James W. Fryer United States 6 251 1.2× 245 1.2× 28 0.2× 77 0.7× 62 0.7× 6 438
Misook Kang United States 2 276 1.3× 66 0.3× 112 1.0× 181 1.7× 43 0.5× 3 446
Ann G. Phillips United States 8 140 0.7× 131 0.7× 59 0.5× 58 0.5× 89 1.1× 8 343
Silvia Krauth‐Gruber France 10 174 0.8× 72 0.4× 84 0.7× 138 1.3× 35 0.4× 16 368
David B. Centerbar United States 4 205 1.0× 130 0.7× 131 1.1× 126 1.2× 95 1.1× 5 451

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Sligte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Sligte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Sligte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Sligte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Sligte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Sligte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Sligte. The network helps show where Daniel Sligte may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Sligte

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Sligte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Sligte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Sligte. Daniel Sligte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Dreu, Carsten K. W. De, Matthijs Baas, Marieke Roskes, et al.. (2013). Oxytonergic circuitry sustains and enables creative cognition in humans. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 9(8). 1159–1165. 54 indexed citations
2.
Baas, Matthijs, Marieke Roskes, Daniel Sligte, Bernard A. Nijstad, & Carsten K. W. De Dreu. (2013). Personality and Creativity: The Dual Pathway to Creativity Model and a Research Agenda. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 7(10). 732–748. 134 indexed citations
3.
Sligte, Daniel, Bernard A. Nijstad, & Carsten K. W. De Dreu. (2013). Leaving a Legacy Neutralizes Negative Effects of Death Anxiety on Creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 39(9). 1152–1163. 24 indexed citations
4.
Sligte, Daniel, Lindred L. Greer, & Carsten K. W. De Dreu. (2012). Illegitimacy undermines leader creativity only under stable power. International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social. 27(3). 347–354. 2 indexed citations
5.
Roskes, Marieke, Daniel Sligte, Shaul Shalvi, & Carsten K. W. De Dreu. (2011). The Right Side? Under Time Pressure, Approach Motivation Leads to Right-Oriented Bias. Psychological Science. 22(11). 1403–1407. 25 indexed citations
6.
Sligte, Daniel, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, & Bernard A. Nijstad. (2011). Power, stability of power, and creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 47(5). 891–897. 72 indexed citations
7.
Giacomantonio, Mauro, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, Shaul Shalvi, Daniel Sligte, & Susanne Leder. (2010). Psychological distance boosts value-behavior correspondence in ultimatum bargaining and integrative negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 46(5). 824–829. 70 indexed citations
8.
Dreu, Carsten K. W. De, Mauro Giacomantonio, Shaul Shalvi, & Daniel Sligte. (2009). Getting stuck or stepping back: Effects of obstacles and construal level in the negotiation of creative solutions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45(3). 542–548. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026