Daniel Schlager

1.3k citations
50 papers · 964 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Schlager

47 papers receiving 935 citations

Peers

Daniel Schlager
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 442
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Urology 24
  • Biomedical Engineering 104
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 20
Replace Nicholas Kavoussi with:
Nicholas Kavoussi United States
Jens Rassweiler Germany
Jan Thorsten Klein Germany
Henrik Brun Norway
Charles Metcalfe United States
N Samman Hong Kong
Gunnar Hansen Norway
Thomas M. Bernhardt Germany
Arkadiusz Kazimierczak Poland
Francesco Sturla Italy
Daniel Schlager relative to Nicholas Kavoussi United States Nicholas Kavoussi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15.3×
Nicholas Kavoussi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schlager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schlager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schlager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schlager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schlager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schlager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schlager. The network helps show where Daniel Schlager may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schlager, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schlager Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schlager links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016138
2 201480
3 201555
4 202050
5 201247
6 201539
7 201536
8 201130
9 201929
10 201928
11 201525
12 201725
13 201823
14 201622
15 201622
16 201520
17 201820
18 202220
19 201719
20 202118

About Daniel Schlager

Daniel Schlager is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Urology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Rehabilitation, having authored 50 papers that have together received 964 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (17 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (5 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (4 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (442 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations), Urology (24 citations), Biomedical Engineering (104 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (20 citations). Daniel Schlager has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arkadiusz J. Miernik, Simon Hein, Fabian Adams, Martin Schoenthaler, Konrad Wilhelm, Ulrich Wetterauer, Dominik Stefan Schoeb, Peer Fischer, Tian Qiu and Christian Gratzke. Their work appears in journals such as World Journal of Urology, Journal of Endourology, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, The Journal of Urology and Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact