Daniel Schatz

29 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

Daniel Schatz
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 250
  • Information Systems 141
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • General Health Professions 125
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 19
Replace Martin Michalowski with:
Martin Michalowski United States
Saira Ghafur United Kingdom
Deven McGraw United States
Soumitra S. Bhuyan United States
David K. Wyant United States
Khalil Kimiafar Iran
John Mantas Greece
Patricia Abbott United States
Keehyuck Lee South Korea
Jane Taggart Australia
Daniel Schatz relative to Martin Michalowski United States Martin Michalowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Martin Michalowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schatz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schatz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schatz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schatz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schatz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schatz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schatz. The network helps show where Daniel Schatz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schatz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schatz Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schatz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020108
2 2017107
3 202051
4 202148
5 201941
6 201640
7 201639
8 201929
9 202129
10 201227
11 201913
12 202113
13 20209
14 20229
15 20218
16 20188
17 20217
18 20196
19 20204
20 20244

About Daniel Schatz

Daniel Schatz is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Information Systems, General Health Professions and Physiology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (11 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (8 papers), Information and Cyber Security (7 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers) and Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (250 citations), Information Systems (141 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations), General Health Professions (125 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (19 citations). Daniel Schatz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Rabih Bashroush, Julie Wall, Babak Tofighi, Jennifer McNeely, Omar El‐Shahawy, Scott E. Sherman, Richard S. Matulewicz, Maria R. Khan, Marc A. Bjurlin and Joy D. Scheidell. Their work appears in journals such as Substance Use & Misuse, Cancer Epidemiology, The Journal of Urology, Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Journal of Addiction Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact