Daniel R. Prows

3.3k citations
56 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel R. Prows

56 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Daniel R. Prows
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Clinical Biochemistry 101
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 445
  • Biochemistry 88
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 153
  • Molecular Biology 670
Replace Kenji Mizumura with:
Kenji Mizumura Japan
J.A. Solís-Herruzo Spain
H. Carp United States
Qinghua Hu China
Mitsuyoshi Utsugi Japan
Art J. Heires United States
John Zagorski United States
Angelo Y. Meliton United States
Yong‐Dae Kim South Korea
György Balla Hungary
Daniel R. Prows relative to Kenji Mizumura Japan Kenji Mizumura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Kenji Mizumura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Prows

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Prows's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Prows with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Prows more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Prows

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Prows. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Prows. The network helps show where Daniel R. Prows may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel R. Prows, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel R. Prows Line = papers co-authored together Daniel R. Prows links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996123
2 2002113
3 1995111
4 1997106
5 200270
6 200968
7 200267
8 200861
9 199354
10 200053
11 199646
12 200044
13 201543
14 200537
15 200135
16 200234
17 201133
18 200030
19 199929
20 199726

About Daniel R. Prows

Daniel R. Prows is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Epidemiology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (11 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (10 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (7 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (7 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (7 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (5 papers) and Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (101 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (445 citations), Biochemistry (88 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (153 citations) and Molecular Biology (670 citations). Daniel R. Prows has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include George D. Leikauf, Friedhelm Schroeder, Eric J. Murphy, Susan A. McDowell, Thomas R. Korfhagen, Scott C. Wesselkamper, John E. Leikauf, John R. Jefferson, William D. Hardie and Mark J. Daly. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Mammalian Genome, Physiological Genomics and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact