Daniel Prokop

966 citations
32 papers · 608 indexed · h-index 12

Daniel Prokop

28 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

Daniel Prokop
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 316
  • Business and International Management 54
  • Strategy and Management 219
  • Accounting 117
  • Economics and Econometrics 253
Replace Barak S. Aharonson with:
Barak S. Aharonson Canada
Frédéric Sautet United States
Elisa Villani Italy
Lionel Nesta France
Suzanne Mawson United Kingdom
Cristina Boari Italy
Paola Rücker Schaeffer Brazil
Felicia Fai United Kingdom
Lucio Biggiero Italy
Juan A. Martínez-Román Spain
Daniel Prokop relative to Barak S. Aharonson Canada Barak S. Aharonson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Barak S. Aharonson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Prokop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Prokop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Prokop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Prokop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Prokop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Prokop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Prokop. The network helps show where Daniel Prokop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Prokop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Prokop Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Prokop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20240
3 20234
4 202310
5 20226
6 202111
7 20216
8 202160
9 20201
10 20200
11 201944
12 201990
13 2017105
14
Contemporary Czech Society
20162
15 201669
16 201526
17
Regional competitiveness, economic growth and stages of development
201425
18 201435
19 201413
20
Sourcing knowledge for innovation
20105

About Daniel Prokop

Daniel Prokop is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, Accounting, Business and International Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (16 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (10 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (7 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (7 papers), Regional Development and Policy (6 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (3 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (3 papers) and Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (316 citations), Business and International Management (54 citations), Strategy and Management (219 citations), Accounting (117 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (253 citations). Daniel Prokop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Czechia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Huggins, Piers Thompson, Hiro Izushi, Gillian Bristow, Andrew Johnston, Nick Clifton, Fumi Kitagawa, Sarah Jenkins, Robert A. Huggins and David Pickernell. Their work appears in journals such as Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Technovation, Regional Studies and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026