Daniel Pollack

992 citations
21 papers · 441 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Pollack

21 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Daniel Pollack
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Applied Mathematics 317
  • Geometry and Topology 141
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 171
  • Mathematical Physics 93
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 123
Replace Marcus Khuri with:
Marcus Khuri United States
Yuguang Shi China
Jeff Viaclovsky United States
S.-T. Yau United States
Anna María Candela Italy
Hubert L. Bray United States
Andrea Ratto Italy
L. M. Sibner United States
Peter M. Topping United Kingdom
Daniel Pollack relative to Marcus Khuri United States Marcus Khuri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Marcus Khuri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pollack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pollack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pollack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pollack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pollack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pollack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pollack. The network helps show where Daniel Pollack may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pollack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pollack Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pollack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20182
2 201412
3 201039
4
The Cauchy problem for Schrödinger flows into Kähler manifolds
20104
5 201011
6 20098
7 20061
8 200611
9 200623
10 200533
11 200527
12 200420
13 200320
14 200132
15 199666
16 199650
17 199529
18
199313
19 199335
20
The extent of nonuniqueness for the Yamabe problem
19913

About Daniel Pollack

Daniel Pollack is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (9 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (9 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (7 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (6 papers), Advanced Differential Geometry Research (5 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (2 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (2 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (317 citations), Geometry and Topology (141 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (171 citations), Mathematical Physics (93 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (123 citations). Daniel Pollack has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Rafe Mazzeo, James Isenberg, Piotr T. Chruściel, Karen Uhlenbeck, Rob Kusner, Gregory J. Galloway, Frank Pacard, Yvonne Choquet–Bruhat, David Maxwell and Tobias Lamm. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Asian Journal of Mathematics, Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics and Indiana University Mathematics Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026