Daniel Nagaj

1.3k citations
29 papers · 654 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Nagaj

29 papers receiving 626 citations

Peers

Daniel Nagaj
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Artificial Intelligence 516
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 411
  • Computational Mathematics 7
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 123
  • Condensed Matter Physics 69
Replace M. Van den Nest with:
M. Van den Nest Austria
A. Shen China
Ken Xuan Wei United States
K. G. H. Vollbrecht Germany
Artur García-Sáez Spain
Andrew Eddins United States
Jonas Haferkamp Germany
Sonika Johri United States
Maarten Van den Nest Germany
Keith S. M. Lee United States
Daniel Nagaj relative to M. Van den Nest Austria M. Van den Nest's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
M. Van den Nest · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Nagaj

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Nagaj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Nagaj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Nagaj more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Nagaj

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Nagaj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Nagaj. The network helps show where Daniel Nagaj may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Nagaj, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Nagaj Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Nagaj links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201295
2 201261
3 200858
4 202050
5 200935
6 200835
7 200834
8 201134
9 200931
10 201022
11 200721
12 201320
13 201019
14 202217
15 201017
16 201215
17 201615
18 201014
19 201812
20 201212

About Daniel Nagaj

Daniel Nagaj is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Condensed Matter Physics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 29 papers that have together received 654 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (26 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (15 papers), Quantum many-body systems (8 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (7 papers), Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers), Machine Learning and Algorithms (4 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (516 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (411 citations), Computational Mathematics (7 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (123 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (69 citations). Daniel Nagaj has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paweł Wocjan, Mária Kieferová, Rolando D. Somma, Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, Peter W. Shor, Sam Gutmann, Ramis Movassagh, Dominik Hangleiter and Vladimír Bužek. Their work appears in journals such as Quantum Information and Computation, Physical Review A, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. A and Nanomaterials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact