Daniel N. Bub

5.5k total citations
95 papers, 4.1k citations indexed

About

Daniel N. Bub is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel N. Bub has authored 95 papers receiving a total of 4.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 40 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 25 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel N. Bub's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (26 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (24 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (18 papers). Daniel N. Bub is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (26 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (24 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (18 papers). Daniel N. Bub collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Daniel N. Bub's co-authors include Michael E. J. Masson, Howard Chertkow, Martin Arguin, Andrew Kertesz, Marlene Behrmann, Alan C. Evans, George S. Cree, Daniel Fiset, Cindy M. Bukach and Ernst Meyer and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Brain.

In The Last Decade

Daniel N. Bub

93 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel N. Bub Canada 39 3.2k 1.6k 924 919 561 95 4.1k
Rosaleen A. McCarthy United Kingdom 28 3.8k 1.2× 1.8k 1.1× 920 1.0× 977 1.1× 519 0.9× 49 4.5k
Freda Newcombe United Kingdom 33 4.2k 1.3× 1.5k 1.0× 613 0.7× 1.3k 1.4× 472 0.8× 74 5.6k
Claudio Luzzatti Italy 33 3.6k 1.2× 1.5k 1.0× 537 0.6× 575 0.6× 313 0.6× 144 4.3k
Jennifer A. Mangels United States 25 3.3k 1.1× 587 0.4× 523 0.6× 766 0.8× 396 0.7× 48 4.4k
Paul J. Reber United States 36 3.9k 1.2× 1.2k 0.8× 743 0.8× 1.2k 1.3× 418 0.7× 71 5.1k
Michel François France 29 3.3k 1.0× 1.2k 0.7× 698 0.8× 639 0.7× 160 0.3× 94 4.4k
Emmanuel Mellet France 40 4.8k 1.5× 1.0k 0.6× 639 0.7× 988 1.1× 428 0.8× 86 5.8k
Vincent Walsh United Kingdom 43 4.6k 1.5× 918 0.6× 1.0k 1.1× 1.3k 1.4× 363 0.6× 99 6.0k
Marie‐Anne Hénaff France 21 2.9k 0.9× 852 0.5× 320 0.3× 653 0.7× 324 0.6× 31 3.3k
Eliot Hazeltine United States 34 4.7k 1.5× 1.0k 0.7× 1.4k 1.5× 680 0.7× 236 0.4× 105 5.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel N. Bub

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel N. Bub's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel N. Bub with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel N. Bub more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel N. Bub

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel N. Bub. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel N. Bub. The network helps show where Daniel N. Bub may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel N. Bub

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel N. Bub. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel N. Bub based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel N. Bub. Daniel N. Bub is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bub, Daniel N., et al.. (2024). On the nature of action–sentence compatibility effects.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 51(1). 133–151. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bub, Daniel N., et al.. (2020). Motor representations evoked by objects under varying action intentions.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 47(1). 53–80. 14 indexed citations
3.
Fiset, Daniel, Caroline Blais, Yong Zhang, et al.. (2012). Caucasian and Asian observers used the same visual features for race categorisation.. Journal of Vision. 12(9). 32–32. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bukach, Cindy M., et al.. (2011). Does acquisition of Greeble expertise in prosopagnosia rule out a domain-general deficit?. Neuropsychologia. 50(2). 289–304. 22 indexed citations
5.
Bub, Daniel N. & Michael E. J. Masson. (2011). On the dynamics of action representations evoked by names of manipulable objects.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 141(3). 502–517. 40 indexed citations
6.
Blais, Caroline, Daniel Fiset, Martin Arguin, et al.. (2009). Reading between Eye Saccades. PLoS ONE. 4(7). e6448–e6448. 34 indexed citations
7.
Frias, Cindy M. de, et al.. (2008). Exploring Cognitive Effects of Self Reported Mild Stroke in Older Adults: Selective but Robust Effects on Story Memory. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. 15(5). 545–573. 8 indexed citations
8.
Bukach, Cindy M., Daniel N. Bub, Michael E. J. Masson, & D. Stephen Lindsay. (2003). Category specificity in normal episodic learning: Applications to object recognition and category-specific agnosia. Cognitive Psychology. 48(1). 1–46. 4 indexed citations
9.
Bub, Daniel N.. (2003). Alexia and related reading disorders. Neurologic Clinics. 21(2). 549–568. 12 indexed citations
10.
Woodward, Todd S., Daniel N. Bub, & Michael A. Hunter. (2002). Task switching deficits associated with Parkinson’s disease reflect depleted attentional resources. Neuropsychologia. 40(12). 1948–1955. 81 indexed citations
11.
Dudek, Gregory, Martin Arguin, Michael Dixon, & Daniel N. Bub. (1997). Coding simple shapes for recognition and the integration of shape descriptors. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 44–60. 1 indexed citations
12.
Chertkow, Howard, et al.. (1997). On the Status of Object Concepts in Aphasia. Brain and Language. 58(2). 203–232. 97 indexed citations
13.
Arguin, Martin & Daniel N. Bub. (1997). Lexical Constraints on Reading Accuracy in Neglect Dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 14(5). 765–800. 23 indexed citations
14.
Arguin, Martin, Jeffrey S. Bowers, & Daniel N. Bub. (1996). Implicit lexical access in letter-by-letter reading is not mediated by the right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition. 30. 275–277. 2 indexed citations
15.
Bub, Daniel N., Martin Arguin, & André Lecours. (1993). Jules Dejerine and His Interpretation of Pure Alexia. Brain and Language. 45(4). 531–559. 39 indexed citations
16.
Evans, Alan C., Sean Marrett, P. Neelin, et al.. (1992). Anatomical mapping of functional activation in stereotactic coordinate space. NeuroImage. 1(1). 43–53. 350 indexed citations
17.
Bub, Daniel N., et al.. (1991). Visual neglect and left-sided context effects. Brain and Cognition. 16(1). 11–28. 41 indexed citations
18.
Bub, Daniel N., et al.. (1990). Re-Evaluating the Effect of Unilateral Brain Damage on Simple Reaction Time to Auditory Stimulation. Cortex. 26(2). 227–237. 11 indexed citations
19.
Bub, Daniel N. & Andrew Kertesz. (1982). EVIDENCE FOR LEXICOGRAPHIC PROCESSING IN A PATIENT WITH PRESERVED WRITTEN OVER ORAL SINGLE WORD NAMING. Brain. 105(4). 697–717. 95 indexed citations
20.
Whitaker, Harry A., et al.. (1981). NEUROLINGUISTIC ASPECTS OF LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND BILINGUALISM. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 379(1). 59–74. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026