Daniel M. Smith

18 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Daniel M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 85
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 98
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 16
  • Applied Psychology 17
Replace Barbara Diana with:
Barbara Diana Italy
Takehiro Iwatsuki United States
Luke Wilkins United Kingdom
Hallie Zwibel United States
Bradley Fawver United States
Tanja Kajtna Slovenia
Ricardo Drews Brazil
Priscila Lopes Cardozo Brazil
Emanuela Pierantozzi Italy
Oliver R. Runswick United Kingdom
Daniel M. Smith relative to Barbara Diana Italy Barbara Diana's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Barbara Diana · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Smith. The network helps show where Daniel M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202165
2 201550
3 202229
4 202026
5 201724
6 201816
7 202211
8 20219
9 20239
10 20199
11 20208
12 20233
13 20163
14 20222
15 20142
16 20181
17 19661
18 19731
19 20221
20 20250

About Daniel M. Smith

Daniel M. Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport Psychology and Performance (4 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (3 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (3 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (85 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (49 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (98 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (16 citations) and Applied Psychology (17 citations). Daniel M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Benny Geys, Sarah E. Martiny, Meiqi Zhang, Matthew M. Davis, Yanping Hu, Jianfeng Luo, Haiqing Fu, Lena H. Ting, Yan Luo and Jieru Ma. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, The American Historical Review, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Psychology of sport and exercise and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact