Daniel M. Baer

25 papers receiving 217 citations

Peers

Daniel M. Baer
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Neurology 44
  • Emergency Medicine 24
  • Toxicology 8
  • Nephrology 14
  • Physiology 46
Replace L Lemberg with:
L Lemberg United States
U. Börner Germany
Harakh V. Dedhia United States
Roger Kerzner United States
Gary B Zuckerman United States
Charles D. Bayliff Canada
James M. Byers United States
Richard J. Haskell United States
Lewis C. Mills United States
P. Herlevsen Denmark
Daniel M. Baer relative to L Lemberg United States L Lemberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
L Lemberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Baer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Baer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Baer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Baer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Baer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Baer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Baer. The network helps show where Daniel M. Baer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Baer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Baer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Baer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196065
2 200562
3
Interpretations in therapeutic drug monitoring
198119
4 196517
5
Investigating elevated potassium values.
200613
6 199012
7 19688
8 19678
9 19936
10 19835
11
Cut-off and toxicity levels for drugs-of-abuse testing.
20035
12 19774
13
ACID-BASE DISORDERS. THE CLINICAL USE OF THE ASTRUP METHOD OF DETERMINING PH, PCO2 AND BASE EXCESS.
19644
14 19864
15 19873
16 19863
17 20042
18 19582
19 19612
20 20012

About Daniel M. Baer

Daniel M. Baer is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Nephrology and Molecular Biology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (9 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (3 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers), Vitamin K Research Studies (1 paper), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (1 paper) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (44 citations), Emergency Medicine (24 citations), Toxicology (8 citations), Nephrology (14 citations) and Physiology (46 citations). Daniel M. Baer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John J. Osborn, Raphael J. Leo, Richard Belsey, Don C. Wood, Raymond Gambino, Ronald N. Jones, Thomas V. Feichtmeir, Kenneth D. Jenkins, William H. Horner and James K. Smolev. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Clinical Chemistry, CHEST Journal, The Journal of Urology and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact