This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Light's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Light with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Light more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Light. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Light. The network helps show where Daniel Light may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Light
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Light.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Light based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Light. Daniel Light is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Light, Daniel & Elizabeth E. Pierson. (2014). Increasing Student Engagement in Math: The Use of Khan Academy in Chilean Classrooms. The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (The University of the West Indies). 10(2). 103–119.24 indexed citations
Light, Daniel. (2012). Principals for Web 2.0 Success: 10 Ways to Build Vibrant Learning Communities with the Read/Write Web.. Learning and leading with technology. 39(8). 18–20.2 indexed citations
Light, Daniel. (2011). Do Web 2.0 Right.. Learning and leading with technology. 38(5). 10.11 indexed citations
9.
Light, Daniel. (2011). Building a classroom learning community: three instructional design principles for a Web 2.0 world. Global Learn. 2011(1). 333–340.1 indexed citations
10.
Pierson, Elizabeth A., et al.. (2011). Using Classroom Assessment to Promote 21st Century Learning in Emerging Market Countries. Global Learn. 2011(1). 419–429.13 indexed citations
11.
Light, Daniel. (2010). ð Multiple factors supporting the transition to ICT-rich learning environments in India, Turkey, and Chile. International journal of education and development using information and communication technology. 6(4). 39–51.2 indexed citations
12.
Light, Daniel, et al.. (2010). Integrating Web 2.0 Tools into the Classroom: Changing the Culture of Learning..19 indexed citations
13.
Light, Daniel. (2009). The Role of ICT in Enhancing Education in Developing Countries: Findings from an Evaluation of The Intel Teach Essentials Course in India, Turkey, and Chile.26 indexed citations
14.
Breiter, Andreas & Daniel Light. (2006). Data for School Improvement: Factors for Designing Effective Information Systems to Support Decision-Making in Schools. Educational Technology & Society. 9(3). 206–217.55 indexed citations
15.
Mandinach, Ellen B., Margaret Honey, & Daniel Light. (2006). A Theoretical Framework for Data-Driven Decision Making.68 indexed citations
Culp, Katherine McMillan, et al.. (2004). Intel Teach to the Future Preservice Program: Findings from a formative evaluation. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2004(1). 988–991.2 indexed citations
18.
Breiter, Andreas & Daniel Light. (2004). Decision Support Systems in Schools - from Data Collection to Decision Making. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 248.6 indexed citations
19.
Light, Daniel, et al.. (2003). Learning from the pioneers: A Study on the Best Practices of the network TELAR. Digital Education Review. 17–39.1 indexed citations
20.
Honey, Margaret, et al.. (1998). The Union City Story: Education Reform and Technology Students' Performance on Standardized Tests..11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.