Daniel L. McCartney

35 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel L. McCartney
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Biological Psychiatry 35
  • Aging 25
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 159
  • Molecular Biology 619
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 105
Replace Rosie M. Walker with:
Rosie M. Walker United Kingdom
Robert F. Hillary United Kingdom
Peter Fransquet Australia
Jude Gibson United Kingdom
Jacob K. Kresovich United States
Stewart W. Morris United Kingdom
Hanieh Yaghootkar United Kingdom
Cynthia Kusters United States
Alexandra M. Binder United States
Foram N. Ashar United States
Daniel L. McCartney relative to Rosie M. Walker United Kingdom Rosie M. Walker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rosie M. Walker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. McCartney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. McCartney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. McCartney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. McCartney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. McCartney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. McCartney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. McCartney. The network helps show where Daniel L. McCartney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel L. McCartney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel L. McCartney Line = papers co-authored together Daniel L. McCartney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016225
2 2020125
3 201894
4 202371
5 201859
6 201847
7 202044
8 202339
9 201939
10 202337
11 202236
12 202033
13 202132
14 202025
15 201425
16 202125
17 202223
18 201621
19 201920
20 202219

About Daniel L. McCartney

Daniel L. McCartney is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (23 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (3 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (3 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers) and Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (35 citations), Aging (25 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (159 citations), Molecular Biology (619 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (105 citations). Daniel L. McCartney has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew M. McIntosh, Kathryn L. Evans, Rosie M. Walker, David J. Porteous, Riccardo E. Marioni, Stewart W. Morris, Ian J. Deary, Robert F. Hillary, Archie Campbell and Anna J. Stevenson. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Epigenetics, Nature Communications, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Genome Medicine and Brain Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact