Daniel L. Mahr
- Insect Science top 5%
- Plant Science
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Stephen D. CockfieldJesusa C. LegaspiShawn A. SteffanJohn J. ObryckiRobert J. O’NeilKent M. DaaneDennis E. McCabeDavid R. Russell
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (18 papers)Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (8 papers)Insect behavior and control techniques (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Daniel L. Mahr
28 papers receiving 267 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Insect Science 220
- Plant Science 140
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 104
- Molecular Biology 73
- Ecology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Mahr
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Mahr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Mahr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Mahr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. Mahr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Mahr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Mahr. The network helps show where Daniel L. Mahr may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel L. Mahr
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel L. Mahr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel L. Mahr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel L. Mahr. Daniel L. Mahr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | Phenology of Oviposition of Dasyneura Oxycoccana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in Relation to Cranberry Plant Growth and Flowering | 7 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | Light Trap Records of Phyllophaga (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Wisconsin, 1984-1987 | 1 |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Development of cranberry girdler, Chrysoteuchia topiaria (Lepidoptera: Pyraliadae) in relation to temperature. | 3 |
| 17 | Chemical, natural, and cultural control of Hyadaphis tataricae (Homoptera: Aphididae) on honeysuckle | 1 |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Daniel L. Mahr
Daniel L. Mahr is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (18 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (8 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (220 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (104 citations) and Plant Science (140 citations). Daniel L. Mahr has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Stephen D. Cockfield, Jesusa C. Legaspi, Shawn A. Steffan, John J. Obrycki, Robert J. O’Neil, Kent M. Daane, Dennis E. McCabe, David R. Russell, Brent H. McCown and Murray K. Clayton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Entomology, Biological Control and Environmental Entomology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.