Daniel Potter

8.0k citations
223 papers · 6.0k indexed · h-index 41

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Potter

219 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Peers

Daniel Potter
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Insect Science 3.6k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.7k
  • Ecology 1.4k
  • Environmental Chemistry 460
  • Plant Science 1.6k
Replace Luc De Bruyn with:
Luc De Bruyn Belgium
Jamie R. Stevens United Kingdom
Richard W. Merritt United States
Β. M. Doube Australia
Håvard Kauserud Norway
John Davison Estonia
Matthew R. Helmus United States
D. Lee Taylor United States
John Jaenike United States
Frederik Hendrickx Belgium
Daniel Potter relative to Luc De Bruyn Belgium Luc De Bruyn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Luc De Bruyn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Potter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Potter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Potter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Potter. The network helps show where Daniel Potter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Potter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Potter Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Potter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 223 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007265
2 2002254
3
Destructive Turfgrass Insects: Biology, Diagnosis, and Control
1998186
4 1995132
5 1985114
6 2007111
7 201499
8 201398
9 199196
10 200192
11 199688
12 199979
13 200278
14 197675
15 199072
16 198771
17 199270
18 199069
19 200067
20 199165

About Daniel Potter

Daniel Potter is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Plant Science and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 223 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (103 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (64 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (63 papers), Plant and animal studies (47 papers), Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (33 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (31 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (23 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (3.6k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.7k citations), Ecology (1.4k citations), Environmental Chemistry (460 citations) and Plant Science (1.6k citations). Daniel Potter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include David W. Held, Carl T. Redmond, Thomas W. Kimmerer, Kenneth F. Haynes, Jonathan Larson, Thomas R. Hamilton–Kemp, John H. Loughrin, Michael F. Potter, Álvaro Romero and Stephen D. Cockfield. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Entomology, Environmental Entomology, Oecologia, Pest Management Science and Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact