Daniel J. Schwartz
- Physiology top 10%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- J. Andrew WasserstromHarry A. FozzardRisa Nakase‐RichardsonScott D. BarnettC. Parker GibbsEarlene J. KuckJames W. WynneC. Ian Hood
- Topics
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (16 papers)Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (11 papers)Sleep and related disorders (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSpain
In The Last Decade
Daniel J. Schwartz
27 papers receiving 584 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Physiology 247
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 207
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 167
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 145
- Cognitive Neuroscience 105
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Schwartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Schwartz. The network helps show where Daniel J. Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel J. Schwartz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel J. Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel J. Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel J. Schwartz. Daniel J. Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 79 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 61 | |
| 19 | 45 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Daniel J. Schwartz
Daniel J. Schwartz is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Physiology and Bioengineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (16 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (11 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (207 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (167 citations) and Physiology (247 citations). Daniel J. Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include J. Andrew Wasserstrom, Harry A. Fozzard, Risa Nakase‐Richardson, Scott D. Barnett, C. Parker Gibbs, Earlene J. Kuck, James W. Wynne, C. Ian Hood, Marc A. Silva and Jamie M. Zeitzer. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation Research, CHEST Journal and The American Journal of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.