Addictive Behaviors Reports

523 papers and 7.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 523 papers published in Addictive Behaviors Reports in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Addictive Behaviors Reports usually cover Clinical Psychology (168 papers), Epidemiology (166 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (153 papers) specifically the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (155 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (109 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (99 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Addictive Behaviors Reports are Christian Montag, Éilish Duke, Mark D. Griffiths, Matthias Brand, Marcantonio M. Spada, Jon D. Elhai, Halley M. Pontes, Silvia Casale, Elisa Wegmann and Attila Szabó.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Addictive Behaviors Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Addictive Behaviors Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Addictive Behaviors Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Addictive Behaviors Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Addictive Behaviors Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Addictive Behaviors Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Addictive Behaviors Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025