Daniel Egel

31 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

Daniel Egel
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Statistics and Probability 97
  • Sociology and Political Science 83
  • Economics and Econometrics 72
  • Political Science and International Relations 53
  • Water Science and Technology 28
Replace Brantly Callaway with:
Brantly Callaway United States
Nithin Umapathi United States
Gregor Pfeifer Germany
Ashok Kaul Germany
Vítor Possebom United States
Simon Freyaldenhoven United States
Matthew Wai‐Poi United States
Paul Makdissi Canada
Jinook Jeong South Korea
Kohtaro Hitomi Japan
Daniel Egel relative to Brantly Callaway United States Brantly Callaway's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.5×
Brantly Callaway · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Egel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Egel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Egel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Egel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Egel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Egel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Egel. The network helps show where Daniel Egel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Egel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Egel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Egel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Egel. Daniel Egel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 0
4 1
5 1
6
Defense Budget Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic
4
7 1
8 0
9 1
10 5
11
Economic Benefits of U.S. Overseas Security Commitments Appear to Outweigh Costs
1
12 0
13 23
14 0
15
Venture Capital and Strategic Investment for Developing Government Mission Capabilities
3
16 8
17
Tribal Diversity, Political Patronage and the Yemeni Decentralization Experiment
4
18
Youth Transitions to Employment and Marriage in Iran: Evidence from the School to Work Transition Survey
1
19 3
20
Inverse Probability Tilting for Moment Condition Models with Missing Data
2

About Daniel Egel

Daniel Egel is a scholar working on Development, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Statistics and Probability, having authored 42 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Development and Aid (5 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (4 papers) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (97 citations), Economics and Econometrics (72 citations) and Development (9 citations). Daniel Egel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Bryan S. Graham, Cristine Campos de Xavier Pinto, Djavad Salehi‐Isfahani, Morgan Bazilian, Henry H. Willis, Howard J. Shatz, Eric Robinson, Patrick Johnston, Alexander D. Rothenberg and Dalia Dassa Kaye. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of Economic Studies, Journal of Development Economics and Journal of Business and Economic Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026