Simon Freyaldenhoven
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Accounting
- Finance top 10%
- Topics
- Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (5 papers)Economic Policies and Impacts (2 papers)Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Economics and EconometricsGeneral Economics, Econometrics and FinanceStatistics and Probability
- Journals
- American Economic ReviewJournal of EconometricsThe Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Simon Freyaldenhoven
6 papers receiving 261 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Economics and Econometrics 151
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 44
- Sociology and Political Science 39
- Accounting 36
- Finance 34
Countries citing papers authored by Simon Freyaldenhoven
This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Freyaldenhoven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Freyaldenhoven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Freyaldenhoven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Freyaldenhoven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Freyaldenhoven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Freyaldenhoven. The network helps show where Simon Freyaldenhoven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Simon Freyaldenhoven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Simon Freyaldenhoven. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Simon Freyaldenhoven based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Simon Freyaldenhoven. Simon Freyaldenhoven is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | XTEVENT: Stata module to estimate and visualize linear panel event-study models | 4 |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | Pre-Event Trends in the Panel Event-Study Designbreakdown → | 234 |
About Simon Freyaldenhoven
Simon Freyaldenhoven is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 6 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (5 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (2 papers) and Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (151 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (44 citations) and Statistics and Probability (28 citations). Simon Freyaldenhoven has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Jesse M. Shapiro, Christian Hansen and Jorge Eduardo Pérez Pérez. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Journal of Econometrics and The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.