Daniel Chávez
Impact in
- Horticulture top 2%
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 11
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 5
- Synthesis and biological activity 5
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 8
- Co-authors
- Rachel Mata (8 shared papers)A. Douglas Kinghorn (12 shared papers)John M. Pezzuto (12 shared papers)Norman R. Farnsworth (9 shared papers)Gerardo Aguirre (20 shared papers)Ratnasamy Somanathan (16 shared papers)Miguel Parra‐Hake (16 shared papers)Laura Acevedo (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Natural Products (9 papers)Inorganica Chimica Acta (4 papers)Chirality (3 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (3 papers)Tetrahedron Asymmetry (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- MexicoUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Daniel Chávez
62 papers receiving 904 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Horticulture 50
- Biochemistry 134
- Toxicology 52
- Organic Chemistry 375
- Inorganic Chemistry 129
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Chávez
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Chávez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Chávez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Chávez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Chávez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Chávez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Chávez. The network helps show where Daniel Chávez may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Chávez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 41 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 34 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 18 |
About Daniel Chávez
Daniel Chávez is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Inorganic Chemistry, Plant Science and Biochemistry, having authored 65 papers that have together received 950 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (15 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (11 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (8 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (8 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (5 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (5 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (5 papers) and Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (50 citations), Biochemistry (134 citations), Toxicology (52 citations), Organic Chemistry (375 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (129 citations). Daniel Chávez has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Mata, A. Douglas Kinghorn, John M. Pezzuto, Norman R. Farnsworth, Gerardo Aguirre, Ratnasamy Somanathan, Miguel Parra‐Hake, Laura Acevedo, Heebyung Chai and Geoffrey A. Cordell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Inorganica Chimica Acta, Chirality, Tetrahedron Letters and Tetrahedron Asymmetry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.