Daniel Bradbury
Impact in
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Papers in
-
- Library Science and Administration 1
-
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies 3
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Joanne CosterAnna CantrellJanette TurnerEmma KnowlesDuncan ChambersElizabeth GoyderViet‐Hai PhungSuzanne Mason
- Journals
- The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances (1 paper)Emergency Medicine Journal (1 paper)Age and Ageing (1 paper)Academic Emergency Medicine (1 paper)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel Bradbury
7 papers receiving 322 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Emergency Medicine 218
- General Health Professions 141
- Economics and Econometrics 81
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 11
- Health Informatics 3
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bradbury
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bradbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bradbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bradbury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bradbury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bradbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bradbury. The network helps show where Daniel Bradbury may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bradbury, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 3 | Why Do People Choose Emergency and Urgent Care Services? A Rapid Review Utilizing a Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Synthesis Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 230 |
| 4 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 59 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 1 |
About Daniel Bradbury
Daniel Bradbury is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Emergency Medicine, Internal Medicine, Neurology and Information Systems, having authored 7 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (1 paper), Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper), Library Science and Administration (1 paper), Hip and Femur Fractures (1 paper) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (218 citations), General Health Professions (141 citations), Economics and Econometrics (81 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (11 citations) and Health Informatics (3 citations). Daniel Bradbury has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joanne Coster, Anna Cantrell, Janette Turner, Emma Knowles, Duncan Chambers, Elizabeth Goyder, Viet‐Hai Phung, Suzanne Mason, Gordon Fuller and Anna Wilkinson. Their work appears in journals such as The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances, Emergency Medicine Journal, Age and Ageing, Academic Emergency Medicine and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.