Markus Wagner

5.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
83 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

Markus Wagner is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Markus Wagner has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 72 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 25 papers in Communication and 23 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Markus Wagner's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (65 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (30 papers) and Social Media and Politics (25 papers). Markus Wagner is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (65 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (30 papers) and Social Media and Politics (25 papers). Markus Wagner collaborates with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Markus Wagner's co-authors include Thomas M. Meyer, Nick Vivyan, Tarik Abou‐Chadi, Daniel Bischof, Sylvia Kritzinger, Jakob‐Moritz Eberl, Martin Haselmayer, Zoe Lefkofridi, Hajo G. Boomgaarden and Sofia Vasilopoulou and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Political Science, The Journal of Politics and Communication Research.

In The Last Decade

Markus Wagner

79 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Hit Papers

Affective polarization in multiparty systems 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 2024 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Markus Wagner Austria 31 2.4k 1.1k 852 456 384 83 3.0k
Romain Lachat Switzerland 16 2.8k 1.1× 1.2k 1.1× 493 0.6× 424 0.9× 199 0.5× 40 3.2k
Jan Rovný France 20 2.5k 1.0× 867 0.8× 378 0.4× 594 1.3× 273 0.7× 36 2.9k
Jan E. Leighley United States 24 2.2k 0.9× 1.4k 1.3× 873 1.0× 281 0.6× 538 1.4× 44 2.9k
Martin Dolezal Austria 14 2.8k 1.2× 1.2k 1.1× 511 0.6× 475 1.0× 178 0.5× 37 3.3k
Jonathan Polk Sweden 18 1.9k 0.8× 681 0.6× 349 0.4× 431 0.9× 239 0.6× 35 2.2k
Cees van der Eijk Netherlands 23 3.1k 1.3× 1.0k 1.0× 687 0.8× 611 1.3× 290 0.8× 86 3.6k
Milada Anna Vachudová United States 22 3.1k 1.3× 1.2k 1.2× 331 0.4× 575 1.3× 269 0.7× 41 3.6k
Jeremy C. Pope United States 14 1.5k 0.6× 926 0.9× 567 0.7× 392 0.9× 370 1.0× 36 2.0k
Gijs Schumacher Netherlands 19 1.5k 0.6× 862 0.8× 330 0.4× 312 0.7× 166 0.4× 62 2.1k
Wouter van der Brug Netherlands 42 5.1k 2.1× 2.5k 2.4× 1.2k 1.4× 625 1.4× 401 1.0× 138 5.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Markus Wagner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Wagner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Wagner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Wagner. The network helps show where Markus Wagner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Markus Wagner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Markus Wagner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Markus Wagner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Markus Wagner. Markus Wagner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Turnbull‐Dugarte, Stuart J. & Markus Wagner. (2025). Heroes and villains: motivated projection of political identities. Political Science Research and Methods. 14(1). 1–21.
2.
Wagner, Markus & Jakob‐Moritz Eberl. (2024). Divided by the jab: affective polarisation based on COVID vaccination status. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties. 35(4). 624–647. 9 indexed citations
3.
Wagner, Markus & Katrin Praprotnik. (2023). Affective polarization and coalition signals. Political Science Research and Methods. 12(2). 336–353. 13 indexed citations
4.
Abou‐Chadi, Tarik, et al.. (2021). The centre-right versus the radical right: the role of migration issues and economic grievances. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 48(2). 366–384. 45 indexed citations
5.
Hübscher, Evelyne, Thomas Sattler, & Markus Wagner. (2020). Voter Responses to Fiscal Austerity. British Journal of Political Science. 51(4). 1751–1760. 53 indexed citations
6.
Aichholzer, Julian, et al.. (2018). AUTNES Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Post-Election Survey 2017 (AUTNES Edition, OA edition). Australian Journal of Zoology.
7.
Bischof, Daniel & Markus Wagner. (2017). What Makes Parties Adapt to Voter Preferences? The Role of Party Organization, Goals and Ideology. British Journal of Political Science. 50(1). 391–401. 29 indexed citations
8.
Meyer, Thomas M. & Markus Wagner. (2017). It Sounds Like They are Moving: Understanding and Modeling Emphasis-Based Policy Change. Political Science Research and Methods. 7(4). 757–774. 24 indexed citations
9.
Meyer, Thomas M., Martin Haselmayer, & Markus Wagner. (2017). Who Gets into the Papers? Party Campaign Messages and the Media. British Journal of Political Science. 50(1). 281–302. 35 indexed citations
10.
Toubeau, Simon & Markus Wagner. (2016). Party competition over decentralisation: The influence of ideology and electoral incentives on issue emphasis. European Journal of Political Research. 55(2). 340–357. 12 indexed citations
11.
Vivyan, Nick & Markus Wagner. (2015). House or home? Constituent preferences over legislator effort allocation. European Journal of Political Research. 55(1). 81–99. 37 indexed citations
12.
Senninger, Roman & Markus Wagner. (2015). Political parties and the EU in national election campaigns: who talks about Europe, and how?. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies. 53(6). 1336–1351. 20 indexed citations
13.
Eberl, Jakob‐Moritz, Hajo G. Boomgaarden, & Markus Wagner. (2015). One Bias Fits All? Three Types of Media Bias and Their Effects on Party Preferences. Communication Research. 44(8). 1125–1148. 84 indexed citations
14.
Meyer, Thomas M. & Markus Wagner. (2015). Issue Engagement in Election Campaigns The Impact of Electoral Incentives and Organizational Constraints. Political Science Research and Methods. 4(3). 555–571. 41 indexed citations
15.
Wagner, Markus & Eva Zeglovits. (2013). Survey questions about party competence: Insights from cognitive interviews. Electoral Studies. 34. 280–290. 23 indexed citations
16.
Vivyan, Nick, et al.. (2012). Representative misconduct, voter perceptions and accountability: Evidence from the 2009 House of Commons expenses scandal. Electoral Studies. 31(4). 750–763. 61 indexed citations
17.
Wagner, Markus, David Johann, & Sylvia Kritzinger. (2012). Voting at 16: Turnout and the quality of vote choice. Electoral Studies. 31(2). 372–383. 79 indexed citations
18.
Wagner, Markus. (2011). When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy differentiation influence issue importance. European Journal of Political Research. 51(1). 64–88. 112 indexed citations
19.
Vivyan, Nick & Markus Wagner. (2011). Do voters reward rebellion? The electoral accountability of MPs in Britain. European Journal of Political Research. 51(2). 235–264. 54 indexed citations
20.
Wagner, Markus. (1991). "Does he take sugar?".. PubMed. 12(1). 87–9. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026