Daniel B. Wright

767 total citations
25 papers, 540 citations indexed

About

Daniel B. Wright is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel B. Wright has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 540 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Daniel B. Wright's work include Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers) and Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers). Daniel B. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers) and Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers). Daniel B. Wright collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Daniel B. Wright's co-authors include George Gaskell, Catherine E. Boyd, Colin Tredoux, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Colm O’Muircheartaigh, Asia A. Eaton, Elin M. Skagerberg, Melanie Hall, Ruth Horry and Glynis M. Breakwell and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of Psychology, Public Opinion Quarterly and Journal of Research in Personality.

In The Last Decade

Daniel B. Wright

23 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel B. Wright United Kingdom 13 270 145 144 138 70 25 540
Alison Jane Martingano United States 8 91 0.3× 265 1.8× 174 1.2× 101 0.7× 106 1.5× 23 650
Lital Ruderman United States 10 352 1.3× 85 0.6× 69 0.5× 184 1.3× 162 2.3× 14 755
Adam Lonsdale United Kingdom 12 275 1.0× 281 1.9× 138 1.0× 97 0.7× 56 0.8× 21 769
Deryn Strange United States 18 511 1.9× 351 2.4× 203 1.4× 111 0.8× 230 3.3× 55 893
Qicheng Jing China 13 262 1.0× 186 1.3× 110 0.8× 166 1.2× 106 1.5× 20 692
Carla C. Chandler United States 12 290 1.1× 322 2.2× 168 1.2× 77 0.6× 85 1.2× 15 651
Noah S. Glassman United States 8 109 0.4× 316 2.2× 263 1.8× 126 0.9× 151 2.2× 12 569
Lucía Magis‐Weinberg United States 11 148 0.5× 189 1.3× 214 1.5× 138 1.0× 225 3.2× 29 768
Heather D. Flowe United Kingdom 20 605 2.2× 438 3.0× 185 1.3× 187 1.4× 240 3.4× 80 1.1k
Michael S. Brady United Kingdom 12 316 1.2× 273 1.9× 77 0.5× 78 0.6× 51 0.7× 35 571

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel B. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel B. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel B. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel B. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel B. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel B. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel B. Wright. The network helps show where Daniel B. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel B. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel B. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel B. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel B. Wright. Daniel B. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Breakwell, Glynis M., Rusi Jaspal, & Daniel B. Wright. (2023). Identity resilience, science mistrust, COVID-19 risk and fear predictors of vaccine positivity and vaccination likelihood: A survey of UK and Portuguese samples. Journal of Health Psychology. 28(8). 747–759. 12 indexed citations
2.
Wright, Daniel B.. (2023). Methodological considerations and assumptions in social science survey research. Journal of the British Academy. 11. 35–58. 2 indexed citations
3.
Wright, Daniel B., et al.. (2022). Underlying motivators for anti‐vaccination attitudes amongst regional Sunshine Coast parents in Australia. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 34(2). 579–586. 2 indexed citations
4.
Wright, Daniel B.. (2019). Research Methods for Education With Technology: Four Concerns, Examples, and Recommendations. Frontiers in Education. 4. 7 indexed citations
5.
Wright, Daniel B.. (2016). Learning From Others in an Educational Context:Findings From Cognitive Psychology. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology. 15(1). 146–157. 4 indexed citations
6.
Wright, Daniel B., Asia A. Eaton, & Elin M. Skagerberg. (2014). Occupational segregation and psychological gender differences: How empathizing and systemizing help explain the distribution of men and women into (some) occupations. Journal of Research in Personality. 54. 30–39. 23 indexed citations
7.
Carol, Rolando N., Marianna Carlucci, Asia A. Eaton, & Daniel B. Wright. (2011). The "power" of a co-witness. 1 indexed citations
8.
Grimley, Eugene, Daniel B. Wright, & David W. Gammon. (2011). Science without Borders. 2(2). 171–180.
9.
Horry, Ruth & Daniel B. Wright. (2008). Anxiety and terrorism: Automatic stereotypes affect visual attention and recognition memory for White and Middle Eastern faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 23(3). 345–357. 13 indexed citations
10.
Wright, Daniel B. & Melanie Hall. (2007). How a “Reasonable Doubt” Instruction Affects Decisions of Guilt. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 29(1). 91–98. 14 indexed citations
11.
Wright, Daniel B., Catherine E. Boyd, & Colin Tredoux. (2001). A field study of own-race bias in South Africa and England.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 7(1). 119–133. 60 indexed citations
12.
Gaskell, George, Daniel B. Wright, & Colm O’Muircheartaigh. (2000). Telescoping of Landmark Events. Public Opinion Quarterly. 64(1). 77–89. 79 indexed citations
13.
Wright, Daniel B. & George Gaskell. (1998). Surveying memory processes : a special issues of memory. Psychology Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
14.
Wright, Daniel B. & Elizabeth F. Loftus. (1998). How Memory Research can Benefit from CASM. Memory. 6(4). 467–474. 3 indexed citations
15.
Wright, Daniel B., George Gaskell, & Colm O’Muircheartaigh. (1997). How response alternatives affect different kinds of behavioural frequency questions. British Journal of Social Psychology. 36(4). 443–456. 15 indexed citations
16.
Wright, Daniel B. & George Gaskell. (1995). Flashbulb memories: Conceptual and methodological issues. Memory. 3(1). 67–80. 31 indexed citations
17.
Wright, Daniel B., George Gaskell, & Colm O’Muircheartaigh. (1995). Testing the multiplicative hypothesis of intensifiers. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 9(2). 167–177. 3 indexed citations
18.
Gaskell, George, Daniel B. Wright, & Colm O’Muircheartaigh. (1995). Context effects in the measurement of attitudes: A comparison of the consistency and framing explanations. British Journal of Social Psychology. 34(4). 383–393. 15 indexed citations
19.
Wright, Daniel B.. (1993). Misinformation and warnings in eyewitness testimony: A new testing procedure to differentiate explanations. Memory. 1(2). 153–166. 45 indexed citations
20.
Gaskell, George, Daniel B. Wright, & Colm O’Muircheartaigh. (1993). Measuring scientific interest: the effect of knowledge questions on interest ratings. Public Understanding of Science. 2(1). 39–57. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026