Danian Chen

93 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Danian Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Ophthalmology 521
  • Oncology 447
  • Developmental Neuroscience 67
  • Molecular Biology 891
  • Cancer Research 151
Replace Kira L. Lathrop with:
Kira L. Lathrop United States
Robert Henderson United Kingdom
Charles J. Hunt United Kingdom
Alexandra Kaser-Eichberger Austria
Mordechai Rosner Israel
Satoshi Okamoto Japan
Tomoko Yonezawa Japan
Stephen Rothery United Kingdom
Elisabeth Rungger‐Brändle Switzerland
Lubomir B. Smilenov United States
Danian Chen relative to Kira L. Lathrop United States Kira L. Lathrop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Kira L. Lathrop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danian Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danian Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danian Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danian Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danian Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danian Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danian Chen. The network helps show where Danian Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danian Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danian Chen Line = papers co-authored together Danian Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004223
2 2009119
3 200685
4 200776
5 200175
6 200772
7 200565
8 200456
9 201250
10 201638
11 201838
12 202137
13 201333
14
Genomic amplification in retinoblastoma narrowed to 0.6 megabase on chromosome 6p containing a kinesin-like gene, RBKIN.
200232
15 202031
16 202229
17 202325
18 202325
19 199824
20 201723

About Danian Chen

Danian Chen is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (35 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (19 papers), Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology (15 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (14 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (13 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (11 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (10 papers) and Microstructure and mechanical properties (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (521 citations), Oncology (447 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (67 citations), Molecular Biology (891 citations) and Cancer Research (151 citations). Danian Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rod Bremner, Izhar Livne‐Bar, Marek Pacal, Jacqueline L. Vanderluit, Ruth S. Slack, Mahima Agochiya, Brenda L. Gallie, Gustavo Leone, Jeremy A. Squire and Pamela L. Wenzel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, International Journal of Impact Engineering, International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, Chinese Physics Letters and Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026