Mark Hankin

1.7k total citations
42 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Mark Hankin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Hankin has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Molecular Biology, 21 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 10 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Mark Hankin's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (23 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (10 papers). Mark Hankin is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (23 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (10 papers). Mark Hankin collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Mark Hankin's co-authors include Raymond D. Lund, Daniel Goldman, Jerry Silver, Margit Burmeister, Frank Hoover, Mei-Ying Liang, Carl F. Lagenaur, Jakub Novák, Danka Vidgen and Vitauts I. Kalnins and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Mark Hankin

39 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Hankin United States 20 908 612 312 198 136 42 1.3k
Jennie Close United States 15 1.2k 1.3× 328 0.5× 330 1.1× 190 1.0× 183 1.3× 18 1.6k
Deborah C. Otteson United States 21 1.2k 1.3× 395 0.6× 214 0.7× 286 1.4× 183 1.3× 41 1.4k
Anna La Torre United States 17 905 1.0× 422 0.7× 214 0.7× 174 0.9× 101 0.7× 37 1.2k
Federico Cremisi Italy 23 1.1k 1.2× 378 0.6× 303 1.0× 143 0.7× 147 1.1× 60 1.4k
Robert Hindges United Kingdom 24 1.4k 1.5× 1.1k 1.8× 361 1.2× 598 3.0× 182 1.3× 37 2.2k
Xiuqian Mu United States 22 1.4k 1.5× 452 0.7× 184 0.6× 325 1.6× 138 1.0× 39 1.5k
Amane Koizumi Japan 20 1.2k 1.3× 873 1.4× 217 0.7× 99 0.5× 64 0.5× 42 1.6k
Gwynn M. Horsburgh Australia 11 718 0.8× 365 0.6× 137 0.4× 83 0.4× 156 1.1× 11 957
Joseph A. Brzezinski United States 17 1.4k 1.6× 534 0.9× 122 0.4× 288 1.5× 131 1.0× 27 1.5k
Macrene Alexiades United States 12 1.1k 1.2× 432 0.7× 184 0.6× 276 1.4× 86 0.6× 23 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hankin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hankin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hankin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hankin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hankin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hankin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hankin. The network helps show where Mark Hankin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Hankin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Hankin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Hankin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Hankin. Mark Hankin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Hankin, Mark, et al.. (2009). A modified dissection method to preserve neck structures. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2(4). 186–192. 2 indexed citations
3.
Lin, Suh-Chin J., Stephen X. Skapek, David S. Papermaster, Mark Hankin, & Eva Y.-H.P. Lee. (2001). The proliferative and apoptotic activities of E2F1 in the mouse retina. Oncogene. 20(48). 7073–7084. 23 indexed citations
4.
Bone‐Larson, Cynthia L., Mei-Ying Liang, NATALIA V. KAPOUSTA-BRUNEAU, et al.. (2000). Partial rescue of the ocular retardation phenotype by genetic modifiers. Journal of Neurobiology. 42(2). 232–247. 36 indexed citations
5.
Hankin, Mark, et al.. (1998). Maturational changes in cell surface antigen expression in the mouse retina and optic pathway. Developmental Brain Research. 106(1-2). 145–154. 12 indexed citations
6.
Hoover, Frank, Mark Hankin, Jeff Radel, Jane Reese, & Daniel Goldman. (1997). Axon–target interactions maintain synaptic gene expression in retinae transplanted to intracranial regions of the rat. Molecular Brain Research. 51(1-2). 123–132. 3 indexed citations
7.
Burmeister, Margit, Jakub Novák, Mei-Ying Liang, et al.. (1996). Ocular retardation mouse caused by Chx10 homeobox null allele: impaired retinal progenitor proliferation and bipolar cell differentiation. Nature Genetics. 12(4). 376–384. 426 indexed citations
8.
Hoover, Frank, Jane Reese, Jeff Radel, Daniel Goldman, & Mark Hankin. (1996). Opsin gene expression and regulation in retinal transplants. Brain Research. 718(1-2). 124–128. 3 indexed citations
9.
Lund, Raymond D. & Mark Hankin. (1995). Pathfinding by retinal ganglion cell axons: Transplantation studies in genetically and surgically blind mice. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 356(3). 481–489. 11 indexed citations
10.
Bennett‐Clarke, Carol A., et al.. (1994). Patterning of the neocortical projections from the raphe nuclei in perinatal rats: Investigation of potential organizational mechanisms. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 348(2). 277–290. 24 indexed citations
11.
Horsburgh, Gwynn M., Raymond D. Lund, & Mark Hankin. (1993). Retinal transplants in congenitally blind mice: Patterns of projection and synaptic connectivity. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 327(3). 323–340. 10 indexed citations
12.
Hankin, Mark, Ann Jervie Sefton, & Raymond D. Lund. (1993). Transient outgrowth from retinae implanted in the neonatal rat cerebral cortex. Developmental Brain Research. 75(1). 146–150. 8 indexed citations
13.
Hankin, Mark & Raymond D. Lund. (1991). How do retinal axons find their targets in the developing brain?. Trends in Neurosciences. 14(6). 224–228. 31 indexed citations
14.
Hankin, Mark & Raymond D. Lund. (1990). Induction of target-directed optic axon outgrowth: Effect of retinae transplanted to anophthalmic mice. Developmental Biology. 138(1). 136–146. 20 indexed citations
15.
Hankin, Mark & Raymond D. Lund. (1990). Directed early axonal outgrowth from retinal transplants into host rat brains. Journal of Neurobiology. 21(8). 1202–1218. 25 indexed citations
16.
Westrum, L.E., et al.. (1990). Fetal olfactory bulb transplants send projections to host olfactory cortex in the rat. Neuroscience Letters. 119(2). 265–268. 14 indexed citations
17.
Hankin, Mark, Bernard F. Schneider, & Jerry Silver. (1988). Death of the subcallosal glial sling is correlated with formation of the cavum septi pellucidi. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 272(2). 191–202. 35 indexed citations
18.
Lund, Raymond D., Mark Hankin, Ann Jervie Sefton, & V. Hugh Perry. (1988). Conditions for Optic Axon Outgrowth. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 31(4). 218–226. 27 indexed citations
19.
Hankin, Mark & Raymond D. Lund. (1987). Role of the target in directing the outgrowth of retinal axons: Transplants reveal surface‐related and surface‐Independent cues. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 263(3). 455–466. 56 indexed citations
20.
Hankin, Mark & Jerry Silver. (1986). Mechanisms of Axonal Guidance The Problem of Intersecting Fiber Systems. PubMed. 2. 565–604. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026