Dana Walker
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Papers in
-
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 2
-
- Knowledge Management and Sharing 1
- Co-authors
- D J Cohen (2 shared papers)James F. Leckman (2 shared papers)Wayne K. Goodman (1 shared paper)David L. Pauls (1 shared paper)Joan C. Durrance (2 shared papers)Kelly Jakubowski (1 shared paper)Karen Fisher (1 shared paper)Beverley Lloyd‐Walker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Journal of Psychiatry (2 papers)Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (1 paper)Memory (1 paper)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dana Walker
5 papers receiving 615 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Clinical Psychology 588
- Cognitive Neuroscience 279
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
- Psychiatry and Mental health 91
- Neurology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Dana Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Walker. The network helps show where Dana Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Dana Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 420 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 203 | |
| 3 | Community problem-solving framed as a distributed information use environment: bridging research and practice | 2005 | 12 |
| 4 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 0 |
About Dana Walker
Dana Walker is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Neurology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 643 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper), E-Government and Public Services (1 paper), Neuroscience and Music Perception (1 paper), Music Therapy and Health (1 paper), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Library Science and Administration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (588 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (279 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (101 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations) and Neurology (62 citations). Dana Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include D J Cohen, James F. Leckman, Wayne K. Goodman, David L. Pauls, Joan C. Durrance, Kelly Jakubowski, Karen Fisher and Beverley Lloyd‐Walker. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Memory, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.