Dana Howard

30 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Dana Howard
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Health Informatics 11
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 63
  • Modeling and Simulation 8
  • Political Science and International Relations 42
  • Space and Planetary Science 2
Replace Michael Cheng-tek Tai with:
Michael Cheng-tek Tai Taiwan
Victoria Garshnek United States
Wendy Glauser Canada
Aleš Bourek Czechia
Jonathan Herington United States
Si Ying Tan Singapore
Peter Rice United Kingdom
Filippo Gibelli Italy
Francesco De Micco Italy
Jamie Conklin United States
Dana Howard relative to Michael Cheng-tek Tai Taiwan Michael Cheng-tek Tai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael Cheng-tek Tai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Howard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Howard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Howard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Howard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Howard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Howard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Howard. The network helps show where Dana Howard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana Howard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana Howard Line = papers co-authored together Dana Howard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015105
2 198552
3 202139
4 201419
5 202412
6 201811
7 20189
8 20168
9 20098
10 20158
11 20187
12 19757
13 20215
14 20215
15 20254
16 20224
17 20214
18 20233
19 20203
20 19763

About Dana Howard

Dana Howard is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 31 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (7 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers), Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (11 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (63 citations), Modeling and Simulation (8 citations), Political Science and International Relations (42 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (2 citations). Dana Howard has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Lori J. Sokoll, Daniel Pepper, Timothy Amukele, Joy Y. Balta, W. Glynn Mangold, Alison H. Norris, Marta Bornstein, Sean Aas, David Wendler and Benjamin E. Berkman. Their work appears in journals such as AJOB Empirical Bioethics, JAMA Network Open, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Medical Ethics and Journal of Political Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact