Dana G. Dalrymple

35 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Dana G. Dalrymple
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 192
  • Plant Science 171
  • Economics and Econometrics 74
  • Sociology and Political Science 67
  • Soil Science 65
Replace Donald Q. Innis with:
Donald Q. Innis Canada
William Chambers United States
L. V. Crowder United States
Bertus Haverkort Switzerland
Catherine Laurent France
Sélim Louafi France
Gwyn E. Jones United Kingdom
Roland Bunch Switzerland
Lionel Hubbard United Kingdom
Nienke M. Beintema United States
Dana G. Dalrymple relative to Donald Q. Innis Canada Donald Q. Innis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Donald Q. Innis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana G. Dalrymple

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana G. Dalrymple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana G. Dalrymple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana G. Dalrymple more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana G. Dalrymple

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana G. Dalrymple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana G. Dalrymple. The network helps show where Dana G. Dalrymple may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana G. Dalrymple

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana G. Dalrymple. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana G. Dalrymple based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana G. Dalrymple. Dana G. Dalrymple is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Artemisia annua, artemisinin, ACTs and malaria control in Africa: tradition, science and public policy.
11
2
The CGIAR at 40 : institutional evolution of the world’s premier agricultural research network
13
3 3
4 36
5 14
6
Evaluating fertilizer subsidies in developing countries
7
7
The pricing of agricultural capital inputs in Pakistan
1
8
Controlled Environment Agriculture: A Global Review of Greenhouse Food Production
12
9 4
10 1
11 2
12 6
13 1
14 4
15 1
16 1
17 7
18 22
19 2
20 0

About Dana G. Dalrymple

Dana G. Dalrymple is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science and Development, having authored 42 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Economics and Policy (6 papers), Soviet and Russian History (4 papers) and Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (192 citations), Business and International Management (17 citations) and Soil Science (65 citations). Dana G. Dalrymple has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Francine R. Frankel, Vernon W. Ruttan, Jock R. Anderson, Michael J. Phillips, R.G. Echeverría, Swaminathan, Meryl J. Williams, R. S. Paroda, Ruth Haug and Bruce F. Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Economics and Technology and Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026