Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Jock R. Anderson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jock R. Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jock R. Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jock R. Anderson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jock R. Anderson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jock R. Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jock R. Anderson. The network helps show where Jock R. Anderson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jock R. Anderson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jock R. Anderson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jock R. Anderson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jock R. Anderson. Jock R. Anderson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Anderson, Jock R., Dana G. Dalrymple, Ruth Haug, et al.. (2012). The CGIAR at 40 : institutional evolution of the world’s premier agricultural research network. 1–172.13 indexed citations
4.
Anderson, Jock R. & Gershon Feder. (2008). Agricultural Extension: Good Intentions and Hard Realities. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Chen, Shaohua, David Greenaway, Martin Ravallion, et al.. (2004). The World Bank research observer 19 (2). The World Bank Research Observer. 19. 1.1 indexed citations
6.
Mansuri, Ghazala, Shantayanan Devarajan, Jock R. Anderson, et al.. (2004). The World Bank research observer 19 (1). The World Bank Research Observer. 19. 1–146.9 indexed citations
Belli, Pedro, Jock R. Anderson, Howard Barnum, John Dixon, & Jee‐Peng Tan. (1996). HANDBOOK ON ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF INVESTMENT OPERATIONS. In-house reproduction eBooks.91 indexed citations
Thampapillai, Dodo J. & Jock R. Anderson. (1991). Soil conservation in developing countries: a review of causes and remedies. 30(3). 210–223.1 indexed citations
13.
Anderson, Jock R., et al.. (1991). Agricultural technology in Sub-Saharan Africa : a workshop on research issues. World Bank eBooks.6 indexed citations
14.
Pfeiffer, W. H., Hans‐Joachim Braun, Jock R. Anderson, & Peter Hazell. (1989). Yield stability in bread wheat.. 157–174.7 indexed citations
15.
Pham, Hong Ngoc Thuy, S.R. Waddington, José Crossa, Jock R. Anderson, & Peter Hazell. (1989). Yield stability of CIMMYT maize germplasm in international and on-farm trials.. 185–205.1 indexed citations
16.
Anderson, Jock R., Robert W. Herdt, & Grant M. Scobie. (1988). Science and Food: The CGIAR and Its Partners. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).39 indexed citations
Anderson, Jock R. & E. C. Loomis. (1978). Exotic dung beetles in pasture and range land ecosystems. California Agriculture. 32(2). 31–32.18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.